Re: [PATCH] signalfd: don't dequeue the forced fatal signals

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 04/05, Kees Cook wrote:
>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <kees@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!

> Who should take this? I'm happy to add it to my seccomp tree if akpm (or
> maybe Christian wants it)?

I am obviously fine either way, but if nobody objects I'd prefer your tree.

To remind, we have another (slightly related) problem,
[RFC PATCH] ptrace: don't report syscall-exit if the tracee was killed by seccomp
https://lore.kernel.org/all/adKGb5vkyggMK-_l@xxxxxxxxxx/
I still hope to send V2 "soon" ;)

This is certainly the seccomp material, so I think it would be better to route
both changes via the same tree. But again, I am fine either way, this is minor.

But. I forgot to add the "TODO" note into the changelog. And mk_sigmask() is
not a good name... I'll send V2 with these (cosmetic) changes in a minute,
I'll preserve your ACK.

Oleg.