Re: [PATCH v3] rust: ACPI: fix missing match data for PRP0001

[Danilo Krummrich]

On Wed Apr 8, 2026 at 9:40 PM CEST, Markus Probst wrote:
> On Wed, 2026-04-08 at 18:03 +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>> On Tue Apr 7, 2026 at 11:41 PM CEST, Markus Probst wrote:
>> > diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
>> > index aad1a95e6863..d0098f24346f 100644
>> > --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
>> > +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
>> > @@ -187,6 +187,10 @@ struct acpi_driver {
>> >   * -----------
>> >   */
>> >  
>> > +bool acpi_of_match_device(const struct acpi_device *adev,
>> > +			  const struct of_device_id *of_match_table,
>> > +			  const struct of_device_id **of_id);
>> 
>> This also has to be defined for !CONFIG_ACPI, otherwise we run into the
>> following compatible error.
>> 
>> 	error[E0425]: cannot find function `acpi_of_match_device` in crate `bindings`
>> 	      --> rust/kernel/driver.rs:295:24
>> 	       |
>> 	   295 |       unsafe { bindings::acpi_of_match_device(adev, of_match_table, of_id) }
>> 	       |                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> 	       |
>> 	      ::: /mnt/nvme/work/projects/linux/driver-core/driver-core-testing/rust/bindings/bindings_generated.rs:118713:5
>> 
>> There is an
>> 
>> 	#else	/* CONFIG_ACPI */
>> 
>> block at the end of acpi_bus.h for this.
> I don't think the function exists in that case and bindgen can't
> generate inline functions, so I will just add a `#[cfg(CONFIG_ACPI)]`
> condition on top of the function.

Usually we provide a stub instead of conditionalize the callers; this case might
be a bit special, but I'd still follow the usual pattern.

That said, I'm fine with both -- Rafaels call.