Re: [PATCH v3] rust: ACPI: fix missing match data for PRP0001

[Markus Probst]

On Wed, 2026-04-08 at 21:59 +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Wed Apr 8, 2026 at 9:40 PM CEST, Markus Probst wrote:
> > On Wed, 2026-04-08 at 18:03 +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > > On Tue Apr 7, 2026 at 11:41 PM CEST, Markus Probst wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > > > index aad1a95e6863..d0098f24346f 100644
> > > > --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > > > +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > > > @@ -187,6 +187,10 @@ struct acpi_driver {
> > > >   * -----------
> > > >   */
> > > >  
> > > > +bool acpi_of_match_device(const struct acpi_device *adev,
> > > > +			  const struct of_device_id *of_match_table,
> > > > +			  const struct of_device_id **of_id);
> > > 
> > > This also has to be defined for !CONFIG_ACPI, otherwise we run into the
> > > following compatible error.
> > > 
> > > 	error[E0425]: cannot find function `acpi_of_match_device` in crate `bindings`
> > > 	      --> rust/kernel/driver.rs:295:24
> > > 	       |
> > > 	   295 |       unsafe { bindings::acpi_of_match_device(adev, of_match_table, of_id) }
> > > 	       |                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > 	       |
> > > 	      ::: /mnt/nvme/work/projects/linux/driver-core/driver-core-testing/rust/bindings/bindings_generated.rs:118713:5
> > > 
> > > There is an
> > > 
> > > 	#else	/* CONFIG_ACPI */
> > > 
> > > block at the end of acpi_bus.h for this.
> > I don't think the function exists in that case and bindgen can't
> > generate inline functions, so I will just add a `#[cfg(CONFIG_ACPI)]`
> > condition on top of the function.
> 
> Usually we provide a stub instead of conditionalize the callers; this case might
> be a bit special, but I'd still follow the usual pattern.
The usual C pattern would be

static inline bool acpi_of_match_device(const struct acpi_device *adev,
			const struct of_device_id *of_match_table,
			const struct of_device_id **of_id);

, which is ignored by bindgen (i. e. same error).


Defining

bool acpi_of_match_device(const struct acpi_device *adev,
			const struct of_device_id *of_match_table,
			const struct of_device_id **of_id);

while the symbol is missing doesn't make much sense, as we are
basically lying to bindgen.

Thanks
- Markus Probst

> 
> That said, I'm fine with both -- Rafaels call.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part