Re: [PATCH] sched_ext: idle: Recheck prev_cpu after narrowing allowed mask
From: Andrea Righi
Date: Sat May 02 2026 - 01:45:16 EST
On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 10:27:47AM +0100, David Carlier wrote:
> scx_select_cpu_dfl() narrows @allowed to @cpus_allowed & @p->cpus_ptr
> when the BPF caller supplies a @cpus_allowed that differs from
> @p->cpus_ptr and @p doesn't have full affinity. However,
> @is_prev_allowed was computed against the original (wider)
> @cpus_allowed, so the prev_cpu fast paths could pick a @prev_cpu that
> is in @cpus_allowed but not in @p->cpus_ptr, violating the intended
> invariant that the returned CPU is always usable by @p. The kernel
> masks this via the SCX_EV_SELECT_CPU_FALLBACK fallback, but the
> behavior contradicts the documented contract.
>
> Move the @is_prev_allowed evaluation past the narrowing block so it
> tests against the final @allowed mask.
>
> Fixes: ee9a4e92799d ("sched_ext: idle: Properly handle invalid prev_cpu during idle selection")
> Assisted-by: Claude <noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: David Carlier <devnexen@xxxxxxxxx>
Makes sense, good catch.
Reviewed-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
-Andrea
> ---
> kernel/sched/ext_idle.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext_idle.c b/kernel/sched/ext_idle.c
> index 41785f65bbb2..bbb845f36a0a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext_idle.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext_idle.c
> @@ -464,12 +464,6 @@ s32 scx_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags,
>
> preempt_disable();
>
> - /*
> - * Check whether @prev_cpu is still within the allowed set. If not,
> - * we can still try selecting a nearby CPU.
> - */
> - is_prev_allowed = cpumask_test_cpu(prev_cpu, allowed);
> -
> /*
> * Determine the subset of CPUs usable by @p within @cpus_allowed.
> */
> @@ -486,6 +480,12 @@ s32 scx_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags,
> }
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Check whether @prev_cpu is still within the allowed set. If not,
> + * we can still try selecting a nearby CPU.
> + */
> + is_prev_allowed = cpumask_test_cpu(prev_cpu, allowed);
> +
> /*
> * This is necessary to protect llc_cpus.
> */
> --
> 2.53.0
>