RE: [PATCH net-next 14/15] ice: dpll: fix rclk pin state get and misplaced header macros

[Keller, Jacob E]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, May 2, 2026 7:10 PM
> To: Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.keller@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Kitszel, Przemyslaw <przemyslaw.kitszel@xxxxxxxxx>; Andrew Lunn
> <andrew+netdev@xxxxxxx>; David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Eric
> Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>; Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> Lobakin, Aleksander <aleksander.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>; Simon Horman
> <horms@xxxxxxxxxx>; Michal Swiatkowski
> <michal.swiatkowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Jagielski, Jedrzej
> <jedrzej.jagielski@xxxxxxxxx>; Loktionov, Aleksandr
> <aleksandr.loktionov@xxxxxxxxx>; Nitka, Grzegorz
> <grzegorz.nitka@xxxxxxxxx>; Vecera, Ivan <ivecera@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> Kubalewski, Arkadiusz <arkadiusz.kubalewski@xxxxxxxxx>; Nguyen, Anthony L
> <anthony.l.nguyen@xxxxxxxxx>; Wegrzyn, Stefan
> <stefan.wegrzyn@xxxxxxxxx>; Kwapulinski, Piotr
> <piotr.kwapulinski@xxxxxxxxx>; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 14/15] ice: dpll: fix rclk pin state get and
> misplaced header macros
> 
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2026 23:37:25 -0700 Jacob Keller wrote:
> > Fixes: ad1df4f2d591 ("ice: dpll: Support E825-C SyncE and dynamic pin
> discovery")
> 
> Why are Fixes going to net-next?

Hm. It was targeted at next in the IWL patchwork. I'm not sure why Ivan chose to do that. I opted to include this in the series because the patches for unmanaged DPLL support have conflicts otherwise due to the placement of the header macros. I didn't consider that "net" material since its relatively minor issue that I think only causes issues if the ice_dpll.h header gets included twice which it doesn't seem to currently.

Thanks,
Jake