Re: [PATCH net-next 14/15] ice: dpll: fix rclk pin state get and misplaced header macros

[Jacob Keller]

On 5/5/2026 1:33 AM, Ivan Vecera wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/4/26 8:38 PM, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Sent: Saturday, May 2, 2026 7:10 PM
>>> To: Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.keller@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Kitszel, Przemyslaw <przemyslaw.kitszel@xxxxxxxxx>; Andrew Lunn
>>> <andrew+netdev@xxxxxxx>; David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Eric
>>> Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>; Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>;
>>> Lobakin, Aleksander <aleksander.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>; Simon Horman
>>> <horms@xxxxxxxxxx>; Michal Swiatkowski
>>> <michal.swiatkowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Jagielski, Jedrzej
>>> <jedrzej.jagielski@xxxxxxxxx>; Loktionov, Aleksandr
>>> <aleksandr.loktionov@xxxxxxxxx>; Nitka, Grzegorz
>>> <grzegorz.nitka@xxxxxxxxx>; Vecera, Ivan <ivecera@xxxxxxxxxx>;
>>> Kubalewski, Arkadiusz <arkadiusz.kubalewski@xxxxxxxxx>; Nguyen,
>>> Anthony L
>>> <anthony.l.nguyen@xxxxxxxxx>; Wegrzyn, Stefan
>>> <stefan.wegrzyn@xxxxxxxxx>; Kwapulinski, Piotr
>>> <piotr.kwapulinski@xxxxxxxxx>; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
>>> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 14/15] ice: dpll: fix rclk pin state get
>>> and
>>> misplaced header macros
>>>
>>> On Thu, 30 Apr 2026 23:37:25 -0700 Jacob Keller wrote:
>>>> Fixes: ad1df4f2d591 ("ice: dpll: Support E825-C SyncE and dynamic pin
>>> discovery")
>>>
>>> Why are Fixes going to net-next?
>>
>> Hm. It was targeted at next in the IWL patchwork. I'm not sure why
>> Ivan chose to do that. I opted to include this in the series because
>> the patches for unmanaged DPLL support have conflicts otherwise due to
>> the placement of the header macros. I didn't consider that "net"
>> material since its relatively minor issue that I think only causes
>> issues if the ice_dpll.h header gets included twice which it doesn't
>> seem to currently.
> 
> This was because it fixed a problem recently merged to next and at that
> time it didn't make sense to target net branch. Originally it was
> submitted on 02/10 !
> 
> Thanks,
> Ivan
> 

Yea, that makes sense. Unfortunately The Intel Wired LAN backlog is
quite large right now.

I've submitted it in the latest round of net fixes (with the decision to
split the two fixes)

Thanks,
Jake