Re: [PATCH v3] iio: humidity: ens210: Fix missing I2C functionality checks

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Wed, May 06, 2026 at 10:02:29AM -0500, Maxwell Doose wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2026 at 3:40 AM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 06, 2026 at 11:39:11AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 05, 2026 at 06:49:43PM +0100, Salah Triki wrote:

...

> > > > +                           !i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter,
> > > > +                                   I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_EMUL)) {
> > >
> > > This one is now wrong.
> >
> > I meant this *indentation* is now wrong.
> 
> Did something happen to that when I sent the email? Or maybe I'm just
> going insane...

Sounds like latter one? :-)

> slightly confused,

In short this is `if (foo(A) && foo(B))`, and foo should be indented on the
same column while their parameters on different but still same. In your example
the foo(B) is indented as A parameter on previous call instead of indenting as
foo(...).

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko