[PATCH RFC 12/12] Documentation: KVM: Focus acquisition order section on preventing deadlocks

[Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay]

From: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@xxxxxxxxxx>

Now that the first sentence is already described in more detail in the new
section on synchronization while managing guest faults, drop the first
sentence.

Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 Documentation/virt/kvm/locking.rst | 8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/locking.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/locking.rst
index 0663ccfe0633d..f26ea3acd0b70 100644
--- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/locking.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/locking.rst
@@ -26,11 +26,9 @@ The acquisition orders for mutexes are as follows:
 
 - vcpu->mutex is taken outside kvm->slots_lock and kvm->slots_arch_lock
 
-- kvm->mn_active_invalidate_count ensures that pairs of
-  invalidate_range_start() and invalidate_range_end() callbacks
-  use the same memslots array.  kvm->slots_lock and kvm->slots_arch_lock
-  are taken on the waiting side when modifying memslots, so MMU notifiers
-  must not take either kvm->slots_lock or kvm->slots_arch_lock.
+- kvm->slots_lock and kvm->slots_arch_lock are taken on the waiting side when
+  modifying memslots, so MMU notifiers must not take either kvm->slots_lock or
+  kvm->slots_arch_lock.
 
 For SRCU:
 

-- 
2.54.0.823.g6e5bcc1fc9-goog