Re: [PATCH 0/6] userfaultfd/pagemap: pre-existing fixes

[Kiryl Shutsemau]

On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 05:34:48PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 29 May 2026 18:23:24 +0100 "Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)" <kas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > These are pre-existing bug fixes that were carried at the front of the
> > userfaultfd RWP working-set-tracking series up to v5 [1]. Per review
> > feedback that fixes should not sit in the middle of a feature series,
> > they are split out and sent on their own; the RWP series is reposted
> > rebased on top of this.
> > 
> > All six were flagged by the Sashiko AI review of the RWP series and
> > carry Reported-by: Sashiko AI review <sashiko-bot@xxxxxxxxxx>. They are
> > independent of RWP, apply to mm-new directly, and carry Cc: stable@.
> 
> And...  this made Sashiko point at other stuff:
> 	https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260529172331.356655-1-kas@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> I can't figure out why four of the scans failed - "View Raw Log" comes up empty.

Seems to be passed now.

> It's concerning how frequently Sashiko is finding pre-existing things.  What
> would a full scan of mm/ tell us?  Gulp.

Yeah... :/

I will look at the new batch of pre-existing issues when I have spare
cycles. I am not sure I have the bandwidth to find the bottom of this
rabbit hole.

What do you want me to with the main userfaultfd patchset? Sashiko
failed to apply it because it is on top of the pre-existing fixes.

-- 
  Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov