Re: [PATCH 0/6] userfaultfd/pagemap: pre-existing fixes

[David Hildenbrand (Arm)]

On 6/1/26 16:17, Kiryl Shutsemau wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 05:34:48PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 May 2026 18:23:24 +0100 "Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)" <kas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> These are pre-existing bug fixes that were carried at the front of the
>>> userfaultfd RWP working-set-tracking series up to v5 [1]. Per review
>>> feedback that fixes should not sit in the middle of a feature series,
>>> they are split out and sent on their own; the RWP series is reposted
>>> rebased on top of this.
>>>
>>> All six were flagged by the Sashiko AI review of the RWP series and
>>> carry Reported-by: Sashiko AI review <sashiko-bot@xxxxxxxxxx>. They are
>>> independent of RWP, apply to mm-new directly, and carry Cc: stable@.
>>
>> And...  this made Sashiko point at other stuff:
>> 	https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260529172331.356655-1-kas@xxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> I can't figure out why four of the scans failed - "View Raw Log" comes up empty.
> 
> Seems to be passed now.
> 
>> It's concerning how frequently Sashiko is finding pre-existing things.  What
>> would a full scan of mm/ tell us?  Gulp.
> 
> Yeah... :/
> 
> I will look at the new batch of pre-existing issues when I have spare
> cycles. I am not sure I have the bandwidth to find the bottom of this
> rabbit hole.
> 
> What do you want me to with the main userfaultfd patchset? Sashiko
> failed to apply it because it is on top of the pre-existing fixes.

I suspect it might have a minor conflict with another incoming fix from Lorenzo
as well.

Probably put it into mm-unstable early after the next release? At least I think
it's not in mm-unstable yet and we are approaching the net release quickly ...

-- 
Cheers,

David