Re: [BUG?] invalidate_lock not held in read_cache_folio()
From: Matthew Wilcox
Date: Mon Jun 08 2026 - 08:27:19 EST
On Mon, Jun 08, 2026 at 04:54:51PM +0530, Dev Jain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My understanding is that there are two ways we are serializing against concurrent
> addition of a folio into the pagecache (see 730633f0b7f9).
>
> The kerneldoc of read_cache_folio() says:
>
> "Context: May sleep. Expects mapping->invalidate_lock to be held."
>
> I put the following in __filemap_add_folio():
>
> + BUG_ON(!inode_is_locked(mapping->host) &&
> + !rwsem_is_locked(&mapping->invalidate_lock));
>
>
> And got the following trace:
>
>
> [ 0.115587] Call trace:
> [ 0.115686] __filemap_add_folio+0x5dc/0x680 (P)
> [ 0.115871] filemap_add_folio+0xec/0x2d0
> [ 0.116031] do_read_cache_folio+0x144/0x2d8
> [ 0.116194] read_cache_folio+0x1c/0x30
> [ 0.116344] read_part_sector+0x4c/0xf0
> [ 0.116499] read_lba+0xb0/0x1a0
> [ 0.116627] efi_partition+0xa8/0x740
> [ 0.116769] bdev_disk_changed+0x238/0x620
> [ 0.116939] blkdev_get_whole+0xac/0x100
> [ 0.117090] bdev_open+0x280/0x3c0
You can't truncate or holepunch a bdev