Re: [PATCH v19 net-next 1/9] octeontx2-af: Enforce single RVU AF probe

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Tue, 9 Jun 2026 07:56:46 +0530 Ratheesh Kannoth wrote:
> > > The comparison to a generic PCI networking driver isn't quite applicable
> > > here. The RVU AF (Administrative Function) is not a standard NIC PF —
> > > it is a system-level resource manager that owns a single, shared set of
> > > AF registers across the entire RVU subsystem. The hardware spec is
> > > explicit on this: "RVU has a single, common set of AF registers.
> > >
> > > This is fundamentally different from a multi-port NIC where each PF is
> > > an independent, symmetric instance. In the RVU model, there is exactly
> > > one AF device per SoC, and all other PFs  communicate with it
> > > via mailboxes rather than accessing AF registers directly. Allowing a
> > > second AF probe would mean two driver instances racing to manage the
> > > same global hardware state — provisioning LFs, configuring
> > > NPC/NIX/NPA — with no hardware arbitration between them.  
> >
> > I asked you before - is this a driver for a PCIe devices?
> > You said "yes". If so what prevents the user from plugging two such
> > devices into one system?  
> 
> The RVU AF (PCI device ID 0xA065) is not a pluggable add-in card. It
> is an integrated function inside the Marvell OcteonTX2/CN10K/CN20K SoC.
> On-chip firmware programs the PCI configuration space for all RVU
> functions at boot time — setting device ID, class code, and BAR layout
> via RVU_PRIV_PF()_ID_CFG — and the Linux PCI subsystem then discovers
> what firmware has configured. There is no slot, no connector, and no
> mechanism by which a second instance of this device could appear on the
> same system. The hardware exposes exactly one AF PCI device per SoC,
> and that is the only device this driver (rvu af driver) binds to.

SMH, I asked you if it is a PCIe **card** or a SoC device.
You answered "This is PCIe." Now you're saying it's a function within
the SoC. I can see the driver is operating on struct pci_device...

Just say this is an integrated device within the SoC then in the commit
message.