[PATCH 11/12] dt-bindings: clock: qcom,gcc-mdm9607: Use proper address in example
From: Stephan Gerhold
Date: Tue Jun 09 2026 - 10:27:57 EST
Given that this is a dedicated schema for qcom,gcc-mdm9607, we might as
well use the correct memory addresses in the example. This does not
affect the validation itself, but will reduce confusion for readers.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-mdm9607.yaml | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-mdm9607.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-mdm9607.yaml
index ef4b274b5c09..1b0efb1526a6 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-mdm9607.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-mdm9607.yaml
@@ -45,9 +45,9 @@ unevaluatedProperties: false
examples:
- |
- clock-controller@900000 {
+ clock-controller@1800000 {
compatible = "qcom,gcc-mdm9607";
- reg = <0x900000 0x4000>;
+ reg = <0x01800000 0x80000>;
#clock-cells = <1>;
#reset-cells = <1>;
#power-domain-cells = <1>;
--
2.54.0