Re: [PATCH v4] crypto/ccp: Introduce SNP_VERIFY_MITIGATION command
From: Tom Lendacky
Date: Tue Jun 09 2026 - 12:16:05 EST
On 6/8/26 15:58, Pratik R. Sampat wrote:
> The SEV-SNP firmware provides the SNP_VERIFY_MITIGATION command, which
> can be used to query the status of currently supported vulnerability
> mitigations and to initiate mitigations within the firmware.
>
> This command is an explicit mechanism to ascertain if a firmware
> mitigation is applied without needing a full RMP re-build, which is most
> useful in a live firmware update scenario.
>
> The firmware supports two subcommands: STATUS and VERIFY. The STATUS
> subcommand is used to query the supported and verified mitigation bits.
> The VERIFY subcommand initiates the mitigation process within the FW for
> the specified vulnerability. Expose a userspace interface under:
> /sys/firmware/sev/vulnerabilities/
> - supported_mitigations (read-only): supported mitigation vector mask
> - verified_mitigations (read/write): current verified mask; write a
> vector to request VERIFY for that bit
>
> The behavior of SNP_VERIFY_MITIGATION and the pre-requisites for using
> it are bug-specific. Information about supported mitigations and its
> corresponding vector is to be published as part of the AMD Security
> Bulletin.
>
> See SEV-SNP Firmware ABI specifications 1.58, SNP_VERIFY_MITIGATION for
> more details.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pratik R. Sampat <prsampat@xxxxxxx>
Just a few minor comments below, but in general...
Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> v4:
> * Split interface definitions in documentation - Kernel Test Bot
> * Wrap snp_verify_mitigation() under #ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS - Tom
> * Remove check for snp initialized and feature info active for
> registering mitigigation interface - Tom
> * Since init vs init races should not be possible anymore[1], remove the
> sysfs mutex guard as sysfs' own synchornization suffices - Tom, Tycho
> * Dropping the reviewed-by since the patch has changed in a meaningful
> way
>
> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/a043a82c-f3dd-4f29-86fb-60638eaddc9b@xxxxxxx/
> * Remove failed_status interface and report failure via dev_err - Tycho
> * Make vulnerability interfaces root only accessible - Sashiko
> * Move /sys/firmware/vulnerabilities/ to
> /sys/firmware/sev/vulnerabilities/ to be platform specific - Sashiko
> * Guard sysfs creation under a new mutex to avoid racing during
> creation and using the sev_cmd_mutex which would race with
> vulnerability operations - Sashiko
>
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/20260501152051.17469-1-prsampat@xxxxxxx/
> * Intrdouce /sys/firmware/vulnerabilities sysfs interface instead of
> an ioctl interface - Boris
> * Reword commit message to focus on need for a userspace interface - Sean
> * Since download_firmware_ex is the primary usecase of this feature,
> posting this patch in parallel to those discussions[2].
> RFC: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/20250630202319.56331-1-prsampat@xxxxxxx/
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260504165147.1615643-5-tycho@xxxxxxxxxx/
> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/20260430160716.1120553-1-tycho@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
> Patch based on cryptodev-2.6
> ---
> .../sysfs-firmware-sev-vulnerabilities | 19 ++
> drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c | 171 ++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.h | 3 +
> include/linux/psp-sev.h | 51 ++++++
> 4 files changed, 244 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-sev-vulnerabilities
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-sev-vulnerabilities b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-sev-vulnerabilities
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..964362558bb2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-sev-vulnerabilities
> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> +What: /sys/firmware/sev/vulnerabilities/supported_mitigations
> +Date: June 2026
> +Contact: linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> +Description:
> + Read-only interface that reports the vector of SEV-SNP
> + firmware vulnerability mitigations supported by the firmware.
> +
> +What: /sys/firmware/sev/vulnerabilities/verified_mitigations
> +Date: June 2026
> +Contact: linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> +Description:
> + Read/write interface that reports the vector of SEV-SNP
> + firmware vulnerability mitigations already verified by the
> + firmware. Writing a vector value requests the firmware to
> + VERIFY the corresponding mitigation bit(s).
> +
> + The list of supported mitigations and the meaning of each
> + vector bit are both platform- and bug-specific and are
> + published as part of the AMD Security Bulletin.
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c b/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c
> index 068b901034cb..251cc7540f51 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c
> @@ -245,6 +245,7 @@ static int sev_cmd_buffer_len(int cmd)
> case SEV_CMD_SNP_LAUNCH_FINISH: return sizeof(struct sev_data_snp_launch_finish);
> case SEV_CMD_SNP_DBG_DECRYPT: return sizeof(struct sev_data_snp_dbg);
> case SEV_CMD_SNP_DBG_ENCRYPT: return sizeof(struct sev_data_snp_dbg);
> + case SEV_CMD_SNP_VERIFY_MITIGATION: return sizeof(struct sev_data_snp_verify_mitigation);
> case SEV_CMD_SNP_PAGE_UNSMASH: return sizeof(struct sev_data_snp_page_unsmash);
> case SEV_CMD_SNP_PLATFORM_STATUS: return sizeof(struct sev_data_snp_addr);
> case SEV_CMD_SNP_GUEST_REQUEST: return sizeof(struct sev_data_snp_guest_request);
> @@ -1352,6 +1353,156 @@ static int snp_filter_reserved_mem_regions(struct resource *rs, void *arg)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
> +static int snp_verify_mitigation(u16 command, u64 vector,
> + struct sev_data_snp_verify_mitigation_dst *dst)
> +{
> + struct sev_data_snp_verify_mitigation_dst *mit_dst = NULL;
> + struct sev_data_snp_verify_mitigation data = {0};
> + struct sev_device *sev = psp_master->sev_data;
> + int ret, error = 0;
> +
> + mit_dst = snp_alloc_firmware_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
> + if (!mit_dst)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + data.length = sizeof(data);
> + data.subcommand = command;
> + data.vector = vector;
> + data.dst_paddr = __psp_pa(mit_dst);
> + data.dst_paddr_en = true;
> +
> + ret = sev_do_cmd(SEV_CMD_SNP_VERIFY_MITIGATION, &data, &error);
> + if (!ret)
> + memcpy(dst, mit_dst, sizeof(*mit_dst));
> + else
> + dev_err(sev->dev, "SNP_VERIFY_MITIGATION command failed, ret = %d, error = %#x\n",
> + ret, error);
> +
> + snp_free_firmware_page(mit_dst);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t supported_mitigations_show(struct kobject *kobj,
> + struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + struct sev_data_snp_verify_mitigation_dst dst;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = snp_verify_mitigation(SNP_MIT_SUBCMD_REQ_STATUS, 0, &dst);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "0x%llx\n", dst.mit_supported_vector);
> +}
> +
> +static struct kobj_attribute supported_attr =
> + __ATTR_RO_MODE(supported_mitigations, 0400);
> +
> +static ssize_t verified_mitigations_show(struct kobject *kobj,
> + struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + struct sev_data_snp_verify_mitigation_dst dst;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = snp_verify_mitigation(SNP_MIT_SUBCMD_REQ_STATUS, 0, &dst);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "0x%llx\n", dst.mit_verified_vector);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t verified_mitigations_store(struct kobject *kobj,
> + struct kobj_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct sev_data_snp_verify_mitigation_dst dst;
> + struct sev_device *sev = psp_master->sev_data;
> + u64 vector;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = kstrtoull(buf, 0, &vector);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
Should we save some time and check for vector having multiple bits set
before sending it to the firmware?
> +
> + ret = snp_verify_mitigation(SNP_MIT_SUBCMD_REQ_VERIFY, vector, &dst);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (dst.mit_failure_status) {
> + dev_err(sev->dev, "Verify Mitigation - failure status: 0x%x\n",
> + dst.mit_failure_status);
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> +
> + return count;
> +}
> +
> +static struct kobj_attribute verified_attr =
> + __ATTR_RW_MODE(verified_mitigations, 0600);
> +
> +static struct attribute *mitigation_attrs[] = {
> + &supported_attr.attr,
> + &verified_attr.attr,
> + NULL
> +};
> +
> +static const struct attribute_group mit_attr_group = {
> + .attrs = mitigation_attrs,
> +};
> +
> +static void sev_snp_register_verify_mitigation(struct sev_device *sev)
> +{
> + int rc;
> +
> + if (!(sev->snp_feat_info_0.ecx & SNP_VERIFY_MITIGATION_SUPPORTED) ||
> + sev->verify_mit)
> + return;
> +
> + if (!sev->sev_kobj) {
> + sev->sev_kobj = kobject_create_and_add("sev", firmware_kobj);
> + if (!sev->sev_kobj)
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + sev->verify_mit = kobject_create_and_add("vulnerabilities", sev->sev_kobj);
> + if (!sev->verify_mit)
> + goto err_sev_kobj;
> +
> + rc = sysfs_create_group(sev->verify_mit, &mit_attr_group);
> + if (rc)
> + goto err_verify_mit;
> +
> + return;
> +
> +err_verify_mit:
> + kobject_put(sev->verify_mit);
> + sev->verify_mit = NULL;
> +err_sev_kobj:
> + kobject_put(sev->sev_kobj);
> + sev->sev_kobj = NULL;
> +
Extra blank line.
> +}
> +
> +static void sev_snp_unregister_verify_mitigation(struct sev_device *sev)
> +{
> + if (sev->verify_mit) {
> + sysfs_remove_group(sev->verify_mit, &mit_attr_group);
> + kobject_put(sev->verify_mit);
> + sev->verify_mit = NULL;
> + }
> +
> + if (sev->sev_kobj) {
> + kobject_put(sev->sev_kobj);
> + sev->sev_kobj = NULL;
> + }
> +}
> +#else
Just add the CONFIG option to the else and endif, e.g.:
#else // CONFIG_SYSFS
...
#endif // CONFIG_SYSFS
> +static void sev_snp_register_verify_mitigation(struct sev_device *sev) { }
> +static void sev_snp_unregister_verify_mitigation(struct sev_device *sev) { }
> +#endif
> +
> static int __sev_snp_init_locked(int *error, unsigned int max_snp_asid)
> {
> struct sev_data_range_list *snp_range_list __free(kfree) = NULL;
> @@ -1673,6 +1824,17 @@ int sev_platform_init(struct sev_platform_init_args *args)
> rc = _sev_platform_init_locked(args);
> mutex_unlock(&sev_cmd_mutex);
>
> + /*
> + * Register the sysfs interface outside the sev_cmd_mutex. The
> + * _show()/_store() handlers issue SEV commands that acquire the
> + * sev_cmd_mutex, so creating (and on the shutdown path, removing) the
> + * sysfs group must stay outside that lock. sysfs provides its own
> + * synchronization between group creation/removal and concurrent
> + * attribute access.
> + */
> + if (!rc)
> + sev_snp_register_verify_mitigation(psp_master->sev_data);
> +
> return rc;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sev_platform_init);
> @@ -2752,6 +2914,15 @@ static void sev_firmware_shutdown(struct sev_device *sev)
> if (sev->tio_status)
> sev_tsm_uninit(sev);
>
> + /*
> + * Remove the sysfs interface before taking the sev_cmd_mutex.
> + * sysfs_remove_group() waits for in-flight _show()/_store() handlers
> + * to drain, and those handlers issue SNP_VERIFY_MITIGATION via
> + * sev_do_cmd() which acquires the sev_cmd_mutex. Removing the group
> + * while holding the mutex would therefore deadlock.
s/would/could/
Thanks,
Tom
> + */
> + sev_snp_unregister_verify_mitigation(sev);
> +
> mutex_lock(&sev_cmd_mutex);
>
> __sev_firmware_shutdown(sev, false);
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.h b/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.h
> index b1cd556bbbf6..d5e596606def 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.h
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.h
> @@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ struct sev_device {
>
> bool snp_initialized;
>
> + struct kobject *sev_kobj;
> + struct kobject *verify_mit;
> +
> struct sev_user_data_status sev_plat_status;
>
> struct sev_user_data_snp_status snp_plat_status;
> diff --git a/include/linux/psp-sev.h b/include/linux/psp-sev.h
> index d5099a2baca5..98666c5a6f79 100644
> --- a/include/linux/psp-sev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/psp-sev.h
> @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ enum sev_cmd {
> SEV_CMD_SNP_LAUNCH_FINISH = 0x0A2,
> SEV_CMD_SNP_DBG_DECRYPT = 0x0B0,
> SEV_CMD_SNP_DBG_ENCRYPT = 0x0B1,
> + SEV_CMD_SNP_VERIFY_MITIGATION = 0x0B2,
> SEV_CMD_SNP_PAGE_SWAP_OUT = 0x0C0,
> SEV_CMD_SNP_PAGE_SWAP_IN = 0x0C1,
> SEV_CMD_SNP_PAGE_MOVE = 0x0C2,
> @@ -898,10 +899,60 @@ struct snp_feature_info {
> #define SNP_CIPHER_TEXT_HIDING_SUPPORTED BIT(3)
> #define SNP_AES_256_XTS_POLICY_SUPPORTED BIT(4)
> #define SNP_CXL_ALLOW_POLICY_SUPPORTED BIT(5)
> +#define SNP_VERIFY_MITIGATION_SUPPORTED BIT(13)
>
> /* Feature bits in EBX */
> #define SNP_SEV_TIO_SUPPORTED BIT(1)
>
> +#define SNP_MIT_SUBCMD_REQ_STATUS 0x0
> +#define SNP_MIT_SUBCMD_REQ_VERIFY 0x1
> +
> +/**
> + * struct sev_data_snp_verify_mitigation - SNP_VERIFY_MITIGATION command params
> + *
> + * @length: Length of the command buffer read by the PSP
> + * @subcommand: Mitigation sub-command for the firmware to execute.
> + * REQ_STATUS: 0x0 - Request status about currently supported and
> + * verified mitigations
> + * REQ_VERIFY: 0x1 - Request to initiate verification mitigation
> + * operation on a specific mitigation
> + * @rsvd: Reserved
> + * @vector: Bit specifying the vulnerability mitigation to process
> + * @dst_paddr_en: Destination paddr enabled
> + * @src_paddr_en: Source paddr enabled
> + * @rsvd1: Reserved
> + * @rsvd2: Reserved
> + * @src_paddr: Source address for optional input data
> + * @dst_paddr: Destination address to write the result
> + * @rsvd3: Reserved
> + */
> +struct sev_data_snp_verify_mitigation {
> + u32 length;
> + u16 subcommand;
> + u16 rsvd;
> + u64 vector;
> + u32 dst_paddr_en : 1,
> + src_paddr_en : 1,
> + rsvd1 : 30;
> + u8 rsvd2[4];
> + u64 src_paddr;
> + u64 dst_paddr;
> + u8 rsvd3[24];
> +} __packed;
> +
> +/**
> + * struct sev_data_snp_verify_mitigation_dst - mitigation result vectors
> + *
> + * @mit_verified_vector: Bit vector of vulnerability mitigations verified
> + * @mit_supported_vector: Bit vector of vulnerability mitigations supported
> + * @mit_failure_status: Status of the verification operation
> + */
> +struct sev_data_snp_verify_mitigation_dst {
> + u64 mit_verified_vector; /* OUT */
> + u64 mit_supported_vector; /* OUT */
> + u32 mit_failure_status; /* OUT */
> +} __packed;
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_SP_PSP
>
> /**