Re: [PATCH v1] pinctrl: qcom: lpass-lpi: drop unused runtime-PM write helper

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 10/06/2026 10:57, Ajay Kumar Nandam wrote:
>> So why do we need __lpi_gpio_write()?
> 
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> Thanks, good point.
> 
> I will respin with:
> Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>


And checkpatch.

> 
> About __lpi_gpio_write(): it is still needed for the in-callers path 
> where runtime PM is already held and we only need the raw MMIO helper. 
> The unused wrapper is lpi_gpio_write(), so this fix removes only that 
> dead function.

No. Why did you have to add __ prefix? Why do we need function named
with such style?

Best regards,
Krzysztof