Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix up QUSB2 PHY description for MSM8996/SM61[12]5

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 02:49:31PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 6/10/26 2:04 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> > The MSM8996 QUSB2PHY was not being guaranteed a power source.
> > The SM6125's QUSB2PHY was believed to be idential as the 96 one. It
> > wasn't. This series tackles that, freeing us of some dt checker
> > errors about vdd-supply not found on MSM8996 boards.
> > 
> > Compile-tested only, but docs confirm my findings..
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Konrad Dybcio (4):
> >       dt-bindings: phy: qcom,qusb2: Straighten out SM6125 and MSM8996
> >       phy: qcom-qusb2: Fix SM6115 init sequence
> >       arm64: dts: qcom: msm8996: Add VDD_MX to QUSB2 PHYs
> >       arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Fix QUSB2 compatible
> > 
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,qusb2-phy.yaml    | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi              | 10 +++++++
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi               |  3 ++-
> >  drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qusb2.c              |  4 +--
> >  4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > ---
> 
> Note that msm8996pro may need even more looking into, but that's a
> story for another day

JFYI, MSM8996 Pro is being used in the DRM / Mesa CI. If there is an
important difference, it would be nice to get it sorted out too.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry