Re: [PATCH v3 RESEND 00/10] KVM: selftests: add powerpc support

[IBM]

Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Wed, Jun 10, 2026, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
>> Nicholas Piggin (4):
>>   KVM: selftests: Move pgd_created check into virt_pgd_alloc
>>   KVM: selftests: Add aligned guest physical page allocator
>>   KVM: PPC: selftests: add support for powerpc
>>   KVM: PPC: selftests: powerpc enable kvm_create_max_vcpus test
>> 
>> Ritesh Harjani (IBM) (6):
>>   KVM: selftests: Print the vcpu_id when KVM_CREATE_VCPU ioctl fails
>>   KVM: PPC: selftests: Use u64 instead of uint64_t
>>   KVM: PPC: selftests: Use s64 instead of int64_t
>>   KVM: PPC: selftests: Use u32 instead of uint32_t
>>   KVM: PPC: selftests: Use u8 instead of uint8_t
>>   KVM: PPC: selftests: Replace u64 gpa, u64 gva|vaddr with gpa_t and
>>     gva_t
>
> Squash these typedef changes into the patch where the "bad" typedefs are used.
> Give yourself attribution for Co-developed-by if desired, but don't introduce
> code only to immediately fix it.

This was noticed only later in v2->v3, and I wanted to keep the original
patch from Nick the same. But no issues, I can squash this in the main
patch in the next revision.

However I was hoping if I can get some feedback on the overall patch
series as well especially the non-powerpc patches (1,2).
One other question - Should this go via powerpc tree or via kvm tree?

-ritesh