Re: [PATCH] mm/memfd_luo: validate serialized_data before conversion

[Pasha Tatashin]

On 06-11 17:28, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 03:37:12PM +0200, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 11 2026, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > 
> > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 10:30:03AM +0000, Tarun Sahu wrote:
> > >> In memfd_luo_finish() and memfd_luo_retrieve(), phys_to_virt() was called
> > >> on args->serialized_data before checking if the physical address is valid.
> > >> Since physical address 0 does not map to virtual NULL (due to direct
> > >> mapping offsets), the subsequent check 'if (!ser)' was ineffective at
> > >> catching a missing serialized_data, leading to unsafe dereferences later.
> > >> 
> > >> Validate that args->serialized_data is non-zero before calling
> > >> phys_to_virt().
> > >> 
> > >> Fixes: b3749f174d68 ("mm: memfd_luo: allow preserving memfd")
> > >> Signed-off-by: Tarun Sahu <tarunsahu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >> ---
> > >>  mm/memfd_luo.c | 10 ++++++----
> > >>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >> 
> > >> diff --git a/mm/memfd_luo.c b/mm/memfd_luo.c
> > >> index 59de210bee5f..10f3983b0060 100644
> > >> --- a/mm/memfd_luo.c
> > >> +++ b/mm/memfd_luo.c
> > >> @@ -397,10 +397,11 @@ static void memfd_luo_finish(struct liveupdate_file_op_args *args)
> > >>  	if (args->retrieve_status)
> > >>  		return;
> > >>  
> > >> -	ser = phys_to_virt(args->serialized_data);
> > >> -	if (!ser)
> > >> +	if (!args->serialized_data)
> > >
> > > We really should make args->serialized_data a KHOSER_PTR
> > 
> > Hmm, that would also be a good idea. I suppose then it would be a better
> > to directly convert to using KHOSER_PTR() instead of this patch?
> 
> Makes sense.

I think we should systematically cover all  phys_to_virt  conversions 
and add  KOSHER_PTR() , instead of an ad-hoc approach of adding it as we 
go. So, let's take this patch and do a series where we properly convert 
everything and provide guidance for others to use going forward.

Pasha

>  
> > -- 
> > Regards,
> > Pratyush Yadav
> 
> -- 
> Sincerely yours,
> Mike.