Re: [PATCH v2] gpu: nova-core: clarify FSP ordering in the chipset table

[Gary Guo]

On Fri Jun 12, 2026 at 4:43 PM BST, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On Fri, 2026-06-12 at 13:06 +0100, Gary Guo wrote:
>> This would be inconsistent with the derived `PartialOrd` implementation?
>> 
>> If we consider Hopper to be after Ada, then we should be able to `assert!(GH100 > AD102);`
>
> This is a comment about how we describe things, not how the code works.  It's because we
> frequently say "Hopper or later" to describe our GPUs' capabilities.  

If the code often needs to say "Hopper or later", then I'd say the comparison
would want to be consistent with that too, no?

When would you want `GH100 < AD102` in your code?

Best,
Gary