Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/7] bpf, skmsg: some fixes for skmsg

[Alexei Starovoitov]

On Fri, Jun 12, 2026 at 6:09 AM Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> All fixes are from previous patches sent by Weiming Shi, Zhang Cen,
> Kuniyuki and Sechang Lim, which have already been reviewed by me and John and Jakub.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260610081218.506709-2-rhkrqnwk98@xxxxxxxxx/
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260520102715.3033936-1-rollkingzzc@xxxxxxxxx/
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260424190310.1520555-2-bestswngs@xxxxxxxxx/
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260424191602.1522411-3-bestswngs@xxxxxxxxx/
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260423155807.1245644-2-bestswngs@xxxxxxxxx/
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260221233234.3814768-4-kuniyu@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
> The automated reviewer (sashiko) may still flag a few other potential
> issues on top of this series. After looking into them, they are either
> already covered by the patches here, or only reachable under very narrow
> conditions that require a specially crafted BPF program and an unusual
> sk_msg ring state, so they are not practical to trigger and are left out
> of this series. I'm collecting these fixes together because the same
> problems have been re-sent many times in slightly different forms, and I
> hope this series can be prioritized for merging so the duplicates can
> finally settle. With so many AI-generated patches floating around for
> these spots, leaving them unmerged just keeps wasting maintainer review
> cycles on the same issues.
>
>
> v2->v3: Target to bpf-next and carry Emil's reviewed-by tag.
>         Reverse xmas tree style is used suggested by Cong.
>         (not all code match reverse xmas tree due to variable dependency)
> v1->v2: fix problem when fix the conflict.
>

Kuniyuki,

one patch is yours. thanks.
Please help review the rest.

Thanks!