Re: [PATCH v2] gpu: nova-core: clarify FSP ordering in the chipset table

[John Hubbard]

On 6/12/26 9:24 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On Fri, 2026-06-12 at 17:07 +0100, Gary Guo wrote:
> > If the code often needs to say "Hopper or later", then I'd say the comparison
> > would want to be consistent with that too, no?
> >
> > When would you want `GH100 < AD102` in your code?
>
> I guess I'm just not being clear.  The phrase "Hopper and later" is just a phrase to describe
> Hopper, Blackwell, Rubin, and whatever comes after it.  The whole point behind the comment is
> that you're supposed to ignore the chip_id numbering when you read that phrase.

And clearly the comment has failed in its goal, seeing as how our
first reader had trouble understanding what we meant. :)  Gary,
any thoughts about how to clarify this? Or is this whole idea
of talking about Hopper and later turning into a problem...?

thanks,
--
John Hubbard