Re: [PATCH next-20260615] mm/slab: Fix build error due to extra argument
From: Calvin Owens
Date: Mon Jun 15 2026 - 14:12:10 EST
On Monday 06/15 at 10:12 -0700, Calvin Owens wrote:
> On Monday 06/15 at 09:32 -0700, Calvin Owens wrote:
> > mm/slub.c:5553:30: error: too many arguments to function call, expected 5, have 6
> > 5552 | return __do_kmalloc_node(size, NULL, flags, node,
> > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > Fix by removing the nonexistent size argument.
> >
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/178153914528.15282.16770125845520023465@330cfa3079ca/
> > Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens <calvin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > I needed to test -next this morning, so passing this along, but please
> > don't go to any extra trouble to use it or credit me if you already
> > fixed it :)
>
> Ugh, nevermind, a different kconfig now fails the opposite way:
>
> mm/slub.c:5551:24: error: too few arguments to function ‘__do_kmalloc_node’; expected 6, have 5
> 5551 | return __do_kmalloc_node(NULL, flags, node,
>
> > mm/slub.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
I guess the line number should have been a clue... I was building on
different machines that fetched at different times, and there were
actually two different SHAs for next-20260615 this morning:
700f8f17ac2c
Author: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon Jun 15 15:43:39 2026 +0100 (3 hours ago)
Commit: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon Jun 15 15:43:39 2026 +0100 (3 hours ago)
Subject: Add linux-next specific files for 20260615
8d6dbbbe3ba6
Author: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon Jun 15 17:26:20 2026 +0100 (2 hours ago)
Commit: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon Jun 15 17:26:20 2026 +0100 (2 hours ago)
Subject: Add linux-next specific files for 20260615
My patch was for the first one. But the second one has a fix for this
applied, so just drop this patch :)
> > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> > index b1de95046b0b..7660f7fa0b2c 100644
> > --- a/mm/slub.c
> > +++ b/mm/slub.c
> > @@ -5549,7 +5549,7 @@ void *__kmalloc_flags_noprof(DECL_TOKEN_PARAMS(size, token), gfp_t flags,
> > };
> >
> > if (alloc_flags_allow_spinning(alloc_flags)) {
> > - return __do_kmalloc_node(size, NULL, flags, node,
> > + return __do_kmalloc_node(NULL, flags, node,
> > PASS_TOKEN_PARAM(token), &ac);
> > } else {
> > return __kmalloc_nolock_noprof(PASS_TOKEN_PARAMS(size, token),
> > --
> > 2.53.0
> >