Re: [PATCH 5/5] spi: dw: use threaded interrupt and optimize the threaded ISR

[Jisheng Zhang]

On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 07:37:30AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 15/06/2026 à 06:40, Jisheng Zhang a écrit :
> > To avoid blocking for an excessive amount of time, eventually impacting
> > on system responsiveness, hard interrupt handlers should finish
> > executing in as little time as possible.
> > 
> > Use threaded interrupt and move the SPI transfer handling to an
> > interrupt thread.
> > 
> > After that, since the dw_reader() and dw_writer() are called in
> > threaded ISR now, so we can delay the unmasking interrupts until no
> > rx and tx action is taken, thus reduce the interrupt numbers further.
> > 
> > Tested with below two cmds
> > ./spidev_test -D /dev/spidev1.3 -s 30000000 -S 327680 -I 1
> > 
> > ./spidev_test -D /dev/spidev1.3 -s 30000000 -S 327680 -I 1000
> > ./rtla timerlat top -q -k -P f:95
> > 
> > The first cmd is to check the interrupt numbers optmizaion result, the
> > 2nd cmd group is to check the threaded interrupt improvement.
> > 
> > Before the patch:
> > each 32KB spi spidev_test transfer triggers 33118 interrupts

This is a typo, should be 320KB

> > 
> > spidev_test reports ~22090kbps
> > and rtla reports:
> >                                       Timer Latency
> >    0 00:00:37   |          IRQ Timer Latency (us)        |         Thread Timer Latency (us)
> > CPU COUNT      |      cur       min       avg       max |      cur       min       avg       max
> >    0 #9958      |        1         0        67    103394 |        6         4      2198    105031
> >    1 #36902     |        1         0         1        18 |        5         4         5        29
> > 
> > After the patch:
> > each 32KB spi spidev_test transfer only triggers 3 interrupts

Ditto, 320KB and only triggers 1 interrupt, I mixed the test result log.
Will update in v2

> > 
> > spidev_test reports ~23520kbps
> > and now rtla reports:
> >                                      Timer Latency
> >    0 00:00:58   |          IRQ Timer Latency (us)        |         Thread Timer Latency (us)
> > CPU COUNT      |      cur       min       avg       max |      cur       min       avg       max
> >    0 #58362     |        1         0         0        29 |        6         3         4        56
> >    1 #58363     |        1         0         1        23 |        6         4         5        68
> > 
> > In summary:
> > before the patch	after the patch
> > 33118 interrutps	3 interrupts	 	reduced by 11038 times!
> > 103394 us max latency	29 us max latency	reduced by 3564 times!
> > 22090 kbps		23520 kbps		improved by 6.5%	
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> >   1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c
> > index feac17655847..cc4cc058ee72 100644
> > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c
> > @@ -132,10 +132,11 @@ static inline u32 dw_spi_rx_max(struct dw_spi *dws)
> >   	return min_t(u32, dws->rx_len, dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_RXFLR));
> >   }
> > -static void dw_writer(struct dw_spi *dws)
> > +static u32 dw_writer(struct dw_spi *dws)
> >   {
> >   	u32 max = dw_spi_tx_max(dws);
> >   	u32 txw = 0;
> > +	u32 tx = 0;
> >   	while (max--) {
> >   		if (dws->tx) {
> > @@ -150,13 +151,16 @@ static void dw_writer(struct dw_spi *dws)
> >   		}
> >   		dw_write_io_reg(dws, DW_SPI_DR, txw);
> >   		--dws->tx_len;
> > +		++tx;
> >   	}
> > +	return tx;
> >   }
> > -static void dw_reader(struct dw_spi *dws)
> > +static u32 dw_reader(struct dw_spi *dws)
> >   {
> >   	u32 max = dw_spi_rx_max(dws);
> >   	u32 rxw;
> > +	u32 rx = 0;
> >   	while (max--) {
> >   		rxw = dw_read_io_reg(dws, DW_SPI_DR);
> > @@ -171,7 +175,9 @@ static void dw_reader(struct dw_spi *dws)
> >   			dws->rx += dws->n_bytes;
> >   		}
> >   		--dws->rx_len;
> > +		++rx;
> >   	}
> > +	return rx;
> >   }
> >   int dw_spi_check_status(struct dw_spi *dws, bool raw)
> > @@ -210,42 +216,59 @@ int dw_spi_check_status(struct dw_spi *dws, bool raw)
> >   }
> >   EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(dw_spi_check_status, "SPI_DW_CORE");
> > -static irqreturn_t dw_spi_transfer_handler(struct dw_spi *dws)
> > +static irqreturn_t dw_spi_irq_thread_fn(int irq, void *dev_id)
> >   {
> > -	u16 irq_status = dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_ISR);
> > +	struct spi_controller *ctlr = dev_id;
> > +	struct dw_spi *dws = spi_controller_get_devdata(ctlr);
> > +	u16 irq_status = dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_RISR);
> > +	u32 rx, tx, imask, mask = 0;
> > +
> > +	do {
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Read data from the Rx FIFO every time we've got a chance executing
> > +		 * this method. If there is nothing left to receive, terminate the
> > +		 * procedure. Otherwise adjust the Rx FIFO Threshold level if it's a
> > +		 * final stage of the transfer. By doing so we'll get the next IRQ
> > +		 * right when the leftover incoming data is received.
> > +		 */
> > +		rx = dw_reader(dws);
> > +		if (!dws->rx_len) {
> > +			mask = DW_SPI_INT_MASK;
> > +			spi_finalize_current_transfer(dws->ctlr);
> > +		} else if (dws->rx_len <= dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_RXFTLR)) {
> > +			dw_writel(dws, DW_SPI_RXFTLR, dws->rx_len - 1);
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Send data out if Tx FIFO Empty IRQ is received. The IRQ will be
> > +		 * disabled after the data transmission is finished so not to
> > +		 * have the TXE IRQ flood at the final stage of the transfer.
> > +		 */
> > +		if (irq_status & DW_SPI_INT_TXEI) {
> > +			tx = dw_writer(dws);
> > +			if (!dws->tx_len)
> > +				mask = DW_SPI_INT_TXEI;
> > +		}
> > +	} while (rx != 0 || tx != 0);
> > +
> > +	imask = DW_SPI_INT_TXEI | DW_SPI_INT_TXOI |
> > +		DW_SPI_INT_RXUI | DW_SPI_INT_RXOI | DW_SPI_INT_RXFI;
> > +	imask &= ~mask;
> > +	dw_spi_umask_intr(dws, imask);
> > +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static irqreturn_t dw_spi_transfer_handler(struct dw_spi *dws)
> > +{
> >   	if (dw_spi_check_status(dws, false)) {
> >   		spi_finalize_current_transfer(dws->ctlr);
> >   		return IRQ_HANDLED;
> >   	}
> > -	/*
> > -	 * Read data from the Rx FIFO every time we've got a chance executing
> > -	 * this method. If there is nothing left to receive, terminate the
> > -	 * procedure. Otherwise adjust the Rx FIFO Threshold level if it's a
> > -	 * final stage of the transfer. By doing so we'll get the next IRQ
> > -	 * right when the leftover incoming data is received.
> > -	 */
> > -	dw_reader(dws);
> > -	if (!dws->rx_len) {
> > -		dw_spi_mask_intr(dws, DW_SPI_INT_MASK);
> > -		spi_finalize_current_transfer(dws->ctlr);
> > -	} else if (dws->rx_len <= dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_RXFTLR)) {
> > -		dw_writel(dws, DW_SPI_RXFTLR, dws->rx_len - 1);
> > -	}
> > -
> > -	/*
> > -	 * Send data out if Tx FIFO Empty IRQ is received. The IRQ will be
> > -	 * disabled after the data transmission is finished so not to
> > -	 * have the TXE IRQ flood at the final stage of the transfer.
> > -	 */
> > -	if (irq_status & DW_SPI_INT_TXEI) {
> > -		dw_writer(dws);
> > -		if (!dws->tx_len)
> > -			dw_spi_mask_intr(dws, DW_SPI_INT_TXEI);
> > -	}
> > +	dw_spi_mask_intr(dws, DW_SPI_INT_MASK);
> > -	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > +	return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
> >   }
> >   static irqreturn_t dw_spi_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > @@ -944,13 +967,6 @@ int dw_spi_add_controller(struct device *dev, struct dw_spi *dws)
> >   	/* Basic HW init */
> >   	dw_spi_hw_init(dev, dws);
> > -	ret = request_irq(dws->irq, dw_spi_irq, IRQF_SHARED, dev_name(dev),
> > -			  ctlr);
> > -	if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOTCONN) {
> > -		dev_err(dev, "can not request IRQ\n");
> > -		goto err_free_ctlr;
> > -	}
> > -
> >   	dw_spi_init_mem_ops(dws);
> >   	ctlr->mode_bits = SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA;
> > @@ -990,7 +1006,7 @@ int dw_spi_add_controller(struct device *dev, struct dw_spi *dws)
> >   	if (dws->dma_ops && dws->dma_ops->dma_init) {
> >   		ret = dws->dma_ops->dma_init(dev, dws);
> >   		if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> > -			goto err_free_irq;
> > +			goto err_free_ctlr;
> >   		} else if (ret) {
> >   			dev_warn(dev, "DMA init failed\n");
> >   		} else {
> > @@ -999,6 +1015,13 @@ int dw_spi_add_controller(struct device *dev, struct dw_spi *dws)
> >   		}
> >   	}
> > +	ret = request_threaded_irq(dws->irq, dw_spi_irq, dw_spi_irq_thread_fn,
> > +				   IRQF_SHARED, dev_name(dev), ctlr);
> > +	if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOTCONN) {
> > +		dev_err(dev, "can not request IRQ\n");
> > +		goto err_free_ctlr;
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I guess that the error handling path should be updated to move free_irq() a
> few lines above.
> 
> Here, IIUC, we should jump to err_dma_exit to undo the dma_init stuff, but
> without calling free_irq().

I moved the request irq code block for debug, but didn't move it back.
In v2, I will keep the code block sequence, then there will be no
changes for err handling code path.

> 
> > +	}
> > +
> >   	ret = spi_register_controller(ctlr);
> >   	if (ret) {
> >   		dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "problem registering spi controller\n");
> > @@ -1012,7 +1035,6 @@ int dw_spi_add_controller(struct device *dev, struct dw_spi *dws)
> >   	if (dws->dma_ops && dws->dma_ops->dma_exit)
> >   		dws->dma_ops->dma_exit(dws);
> >   	dw_spi_enable_chip(dws, 0);
> > -err_free_irq:
> >   	free_irq(dws->irq, ctlr);
> >   err_free_ctlr:
> >   	spi_controller_put(ctlr);
> 
> 
> Also, but completly unrelated to this patch, dw_spi_enable_chip(0) and
> dw_spi_enable_chip(1) seem to be paired.
> 
> Is it in purpose that at [1], it is left disabled?

dw_spi_enable_chip() isn't counter based, so no hard requirement of
paring. I think it's a good practice to call dw_spi_enable_chip(0)
to disable the controller in err code path.

> 
> [1]: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.1-rc7/source/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c#L453
> 
> Just my 2c,
> 
> CJ