Re: [PATCH v2] drm: Guard DRM_CLIENT_CAP_PLANE_COLOR_PIPELINE
From: Maarten Lankhorst
Date: Thu Jul 02 2026 - 04:44:09 EST
Hello,
On 7/2/26 10:16, Robert Mader wrote:
> The client cap is currently advertised unconditionally, even for drivers
> that do not support plane color pipelines. If clients supporting the later,
> like Wayland compositors or tools like drm_info, enable the client cap on
> such drivers they will be left without both color pipeline and the legacy
> properties COLOR_ENCODING and COLOR_RANGE, effectively breaking YUV->RGB
> conversion support.
>
> Prevent that by only marking the cap supported if there are actually planes
> with color pipelines.
>
> Note: while the color pipeline replacement for the legacy properties is
> still under review (1), we can assume that it will work as a drop-in
> replacement. That means any plane on any hardware currently supporting
> the legacy properties will be able to offer a functionally equal color
> pipeline and there will be no technical reason keep using the legacy
> properties if both the driver and the client support the new API.
>
> 1: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20260623164812.81110-1-harry.wentland@xxxxxxx/
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Mader <robert.mader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Replace the driver feature with a simple check (suggested by Maarten
> Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>)
> - Expand the commit message slightly and change the title
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
> index e2df4becce62..b2c0234eaf14 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
> @@ -373,13 +373,26 @@ drm_setclientcap(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file_priv)
> return -EINVAL;
> file_priv->supports_virtualized_cursor_plane = req->value;
> break;
> - case DRM_CLIENT_CAP_PLANE_COLOR_PIPELINE:
> + case DRM_CLIENT_CAP_PLANE_COLOR_PIPELINE: {
> + struct drm_plane *plane;
> + bool has_plane_with_color_pipeline = false;
> +
> + drm_for_each_plane(plane, dev) {
> + if (plane->color_pipeline_property) {
> + has_plane_with_color_pipeline = true;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + if (!has_plane_with_color_pipeline)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> if (!file_priv->atomic)
> return -EINVAL;
> if (req->value > 1)
> return -EINVAL;
> file_priv->plane_color_pipeline = req->value;
> break;
> + }
Perhaps put the most specific check (is there a plane with color pipeline?)
last, and return -EINVAL, as that is the default before
DRM_CLIENT_CAP_PLANE_COLOR_PIPELINE was added.
Kind regards,
~Maarten Lankhorst