Re: [PATCH v2] drm: Guard DRM_CLIENT_CAP_PLANE_COLOR_PIPELINE

From: Robert Mader

Date: Thu Jul 02 2026 - 05:37:39 EST


Hi,

On 02.07.26 10:34, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
Hello,
<snip>
On 7/2/26 10:16, Robert Mader wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
index e2df4becce62..b2c0234eaf14 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
@@ -373,13 +373,26 @@ drm_setclientcap(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file_priv)
return -EINVAL;
file_priv->supports_virtualized_cursor_plane = req->value;
break;
- case DRM_CLIENT_CAP_PLANE_COLOR_PIPELINE:
+ case DRM_CLIENT_CAP_PLANE_COLOR_PIPELINE: {
+ struct drm_plane *plane;
+ bool has_plane_with_color_pipeline = false;
+
+ drm_for_each_plane(plane, dev) {
+ if (plane->color_pipeline_property) {
+ has_plane_with_color_pipeline = true;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ if (!has_plane_with_color_pipeline)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
if (!file_priv->atomic)
return -EINVAL;
if (req->value > 1)
return -EINVAL;
file_priv->plane_color_pipeline = req->value;
break;
+ }
Perhaps put the most specific check (is there a plane with color pipeline?)
last, and return -EINVAL, as that is the default before
DRM_CLIENT_CAP_PLANE_COLOR_PIPELINE was added.

Kind regards,
~Maarten Lankhorst
Thanks, will do so in v3. Will wait a bit more for further feedback and send it out tomorrow.

--
Robert Mader
Consultant Software Developer

Collabora Ltd.
Platinum Building, St John's Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS, UK
Registered in England & Wales, no. 5513718