Re: [PATCH v5 06/19] clk: qcom: dispcc-qcm2290: Move to the latest common qcom_cc_probe() model

[Imran Shaik]

On 03-07-2026 12:43 pm, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 7/2/26 8:31 PM, Imran Shaik wrote:
> > Update the QCM2290 DISPCC driver to use the qcom_cc_probe() model by moving
> > the critical clocks handling and PLL configurations from probe to the
> > driver_data to align with the latest convention.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Imran Shaik <imran.shaik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
>
> [...]
>
> >   static const struct qcom_cc_desc disp_cc_qcm2290_desc = {
> >   	.config = &disp_cc_qcm2290_regmap_config,
> >   	.clks = disp_cc_qcm2290_clocks,
> > @@ -498,6 +515,7 @@ static const struct qcom_cc_desc disp_cc_qcm2290_desc = {
> >   	.num_gdscs = ARRAY_SIZE(disp_cc_qcm2290_gdscs),
> >   	.resets = disp_cc_qcm2290_resets,
> >   	.num_resets = ARRAY_SIZE(disp_cc_qcm2290_resets),
> > +	.driver_data = &disp_cc_qcm2290_driver_data,
> >   };
>
> Now that this clock controller takes a power domain, this needs use_rpm
> = true, or there will be a permanent 'enable' vote

Sure, will add use_rpm = true as a separate patch in next series.

Thanks,
Imran