Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: hci_qca: Clear memdump state on invalid dump size
From: Paul Menzel
Date: Thu Jul 09 2026 - 03:27:48 EST
[Cc: +Zijun Hu from Qualcomm]
Dear Ruoyu,
Thank you for your patch.
Am 09.07.26 um 08:22 schrieb Ruoyu Wang:
qca_controller_memdump() allocates qca->qca_memdump before processing
the first dump packet. For a sequence-zero packet it then disables IBS,
marks memdump collection active, and reads the advertised dump size.
If the controller reports a zero dump size, the error path frees the
local qca_memdump object and returns without clearing qca->qca_memdump
or undoing the collection state. A later memdump work item initializes
its local pointer from qca->qca_memdump and skips allocation when that
pointer is non-NULL, so it can operate on freed memory. The stale
collection and IBS-disabled flags can also leave waiters or later
transmit handling blocked behind an aborted dump.
Clear the saved pointer and memdump state before returning from the
invalid-size path, matching the cleanup used when hci_devcd_init() fails.
A static analysis checker reported the stale memdump state, and manual
source review confirmed the invalid-size failure path.
Fixes: 06d3fdfcdf5c ("Bluetooth: hci_qca: Add qcom devcoredump support")
Signed-off-by: Ruoyu Wang <ruoyuw560@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
index b2d1ee3a3d115..1222f97800f4a 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
@@ -1087,6 +1087,10 @@ static void qca_controller_memdump(struct work_struct *work)
if (!(qca_memdump->ram_dump_size)) {
bt_dev_err(hu->hdev, "Rx invalid memdump size");
kfree(qca_memdump);
+ qca->qca_memdump = NULL;
+ qca->memdump_state = QCA_MEMDUMP_COLLECTED;
+ clear_and_wake_up_bit(QCA_MEMDUMP_COLLECTION, &qca->flags);
+ clear_bit(QCA_IBS_DISABLED, &qca->flags);
kfree_skb(skb);
mutex_unlock(&qca->hci_memdump_lock);
return;
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Kind regards,
Paul
PS: gemini/gemini-3.1-pro-preview commented on several pre-existing issues [1], ideally Qualcomm would look at.
[1]: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260709062250.4166128-1-ruoyuw560%40gmail.com