Re: [RFC PATCH] firmware: scmi: Make SCMI arch independent
From: Cristian Marussi
Date: Thu Jul 09 2026 - 12:07:20 EST
On Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 03:27:00PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> On heterogenious systems like AMD/Xilinx FPGA there is a need to talk to
> SCMI server from different architectures than ARM that's why remove
> ARM/ARM64 Kconfig dependency with also remove ARM from description and
> rename folder to reflect it.
While I understand dropping the dependency on ARM (I always wanted to do
that and test if it worked at all on some otehr archs with QEMU), I am
not sure about the whole renaming party ? why is needed just for
cosmetic reasons ? it is at the end an arm originated protocol so I dont
see it as a being wrong to be named as such even though used by other
archs...I have not really strong opinion on this...
... my concern really is ... wont this full scale rename simply generate
a lot of un-needed churn for future fixes and/or backporting ?
Thanks,
Cristian