Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] PCI: spacemit-k1: Add device data support

[Alex Elder]

On 7/8/26 11:00 PM, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> To reuse the K1 PCIe driver logic for K3 PCIe controller, add device
> data to handle the K1 specific logic and make room for the incoming
> logic for K3.
>
> Signed-off-by: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@xxxxxxxxx>

I have two suggestions/questions, but I think this looks
good overall (please add the space that Andy suggested).

If you drop the data field in the k1_pcie structure you
can keep this tag:

Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>   drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-spacemit-k1.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++---
>   1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-spacemit-k1.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-spacemit-k1.c
> index be20a520255b..f6ae8ff3589a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-spacemit-k1.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-spacemit-k1.c
> @@ -49,8 +49,17 @@
>   #define PCIE_CONTROL_LOGIC			0x0004
>   #define PCIE_SOFT_RESET			BIT(0)
>   
> +struct k1_pcie;
> +
> +struct k1_pcie_device_data {
> +	const struct dw_pcie_host_ops *host_ops;
> +	const struct dw_pcie_ops *ops;
> +	int (*parse_port)(struct k1_pcie *k1);
> +};
> +
>   struct k1_pcie {
>   	struct dw_pcie pci;
> +	const struct k1_pcie_device_data *data;

Is it strictly necessary to keep a copy of the data
pointer in the k1_pcie structure?

It can be convenient to do so if you reuse the fields
in that structure rather than duplicating them, but
often the constant platform data is meant only for
initialization, and never needed after that.

>   	struct phy *phy;
>   	void __iomem *link;
>   	struct regmap *pmu;	/* Errors ignored; MMIO-backed regmap */
> @@ -278,14 +287,21 @@ static int k1_pcie_parse_port(struct k1_pcie *k1)
>   
>   static int k1_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   {
> +	const struct k1_pcie_device_data *data;
>   	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>   	struct k1_pcie *k1;
>   	int ret;
>   
> +	data = device_get_match_data(dev);
> +	if (!data)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
>   	k1 = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*k1), GFP_KERNEL);
>   	if (!k1)
>   		return -ENOMEM;
>   
> +	k1->data = data;
> +
>   	k1->pmu = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle_args(dev_of_node(dev),
>   						       SYSCON_APMU, 1,
>   						       &k1->pmu_off);
> @@ -299,11 +315,11 @@ static int k1_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   				     "failed to map \"link\" registers\n");
>   
>   	k1->pci.dev = dev;
> -	k1->pci.ops = &k1_pcie_ops;
> +	k1->pci.ops = data->ops;
>   	k1->pci.pp.num_vectors = MAX_MSI_IRQS;
>   	dw_pcie_cap_set(&k1->pci, REQ_RES);
>   
> -	k1->pci.pp.ops = &k1_pcie_host_ops;
> +	k1->pci.pp.ops = data->host_ops;
>   
>   	/* Hold the PHY in reset until we start the link */
>   	regmap_set_bits(k1->pmu, k1->pmu_off + PCIE_CLK_RESET_CONTROL,
> @@ -320,7 +336,7 @@ static int k1_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   
>   	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, k1);
>   
> -	ret = k1_pcie_parse_port(k1);
> +	ret = data->parse_port(k1);
>   	if (ret)
>   		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to parse root port\n");
>   
> @@ -338,8 +354,14 @@ static void k1_pcie_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	dw_pcie_host_deinit(&k1->pci.pp);
>   }
>   
> +static const struct k1_pcie_device_data k1_pcie_device_data = {
> +	.host_ops	= &k1_pcie_host_ops,
> +	.ops		= &k1_pcie_ops,
> +	.parse_port	= k1_pcie_parse_port,
> +};
> +
>   static const struct of_device_id k1_pcie_of_match_table[] = {
> -	{ .compatible = "spacemit,k1-pcie", },
> +	{ .compatible = "spacemit,k1-pcie", .data = &k1_pcie_device_data},

In addition to the missing space that Andy mentioned,
adding a comma means the line won't need to change
when you add another entry to the array.

>   	{ }
>   };
>