Re: [PATCH v3 08/16] arm_mpam: propagate MSC read errors for state saving functions
From: Jonathan Cameron
Date: Fri Jul 10 2026 - 15:02:08 EST
On Fri, 10 Jul 2026 16:45:12 +0200
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Allow the mpam_save_mbwu_state() function to return an error, and
> propagate read errors from the lower level up.
I'm not following why propagating errors is related to the
if (val != MSMON___L_NRDY)
as nothing in this patch is changing val.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> index 530ac0fe97b5..b2ecaba29fcc 100644
> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> @@ -1782,7 +1782,7 @@ static int mpam_save_mbwu_state(void *arg)
> {
> int i;
> u64 val;
> - int ret = 0;
> + int ret;
> struct mon_cfg *cfg;
> u32 cur_flt, cur_ctl, mon_sel;
> struct mpam_msc_ris *ris = arg;
> @@ -1799,8 +1799,12 @@ static int mpam_save_mbwu_state(void *arg)
> mon_sel = FIELD_PREP(MSMON_CFG_MON_SEL_MON_SEL, i) |
> FIELD_PREP(MSMON_CFG_MON_SEL_RIS, ris->ris_idx);
> mpam_write_monsel_reg(msc, CFG_MON_SEL, mon_sel);
> - mpam_read_monsel_reg(msc, CFG_MBWU_FLT, &cur_flt);
> - mpam_read_monsel_reg(msc, CFG_MBWU_CTL, &cur_ctl);
> + ret = mpam_read_monsel_reg(msc, CFG_MBWU_FLT, &cur_flt);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_unlock;
> + ret = mpam_read_monsel_reg(msc, CFG_MBWU_CTL, &cur_ctl);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_unlock;
> mpam_write_monsel_reg(msc, CFG_MBWU_CTL, 0);
>
> if (mpam_ris_has_mbwu_long_counter(ris)) {
> @@ -1811,20 +1815,24 @@ static int mpam_save_mbwu_state(void *arg)
> } else {
> u32 val32;
>
> - mpam_read_monsel_reg(msc, MBWU, &val32);
> + ret = mpam_read_monsel_reg(msc, MBWU, &val32);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_unlock;
> +
> val = val32;
> mpam_write_monsel_reg(msc, MBWU, 0);
> }
>
> - cfg->mon = i;
> - cfg->pmg = FIELD_GET(MSMON_CFG_x_FLT_PMG, cur_flt);
> - cfg->match_pmg = FIELD_GET(MSMON_CFG_x_CTL_MATCH_PMG, cur_ctl);
> - cfg->partid = FIELD_GET(MSMON_CFG_x_FLT_PARTID, cur_flt);
> - mbwu_state->correction += val;
> - mbwu_state->enabled = FIELD_GET(MSMON_CFG_x_CTL_EN, cur_ctl);
> + if (val != MSMON___L_NRDY) {
with ACQUIRE() you can just do
if (val == MS_MON__L_NRDY)
return;
and leave the rest where it was.
However I don't actually see what this has to do wiht the main purpose of the
patch to propagate errors. Perhaps a bit more detail in the commit message.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> + cfg->mon = i;
> + cfg->pmg = FIELD_GET(MSMON_CFG_x_FLT_PMG, cur_flt);
> + cfg->match_pmg = FIELD_GET(MSMON_CFG_x_CTL_MATCH_PMG, cur_ctl);
> + cfg->partid = FIELD_GET(MSMON_CFG_x_FLT_PARTID, cur_flt);
> + mbwu_state->correction += val;
> + mbwu_state->enabled = FIELD_GET(MSMON_CFG_x_CTL_EN, cur_ctl);
> + }
> mpam_mon_sel_unlock(msc);
> }
> -
> return 0;
>
> out_unlock: