Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] Introducing pw_lock() and per-cpu queue & flush work
From: Leonardo Bras
Date: Sun Jul 12 2026 - 17:23:17 EST
On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 03:06:30PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>
> On 5/18/26 6:27 PM, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index c2c6d79275c6..7102031207c9 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -21775,20 +21775,27 @@ QORIQ DPAA2 FSL-MC BUS DRIVER
> > M: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@xxxxxxx>
> > L: linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > L: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > S: Maintained
> > F: Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-bus-fsl-mc
> > F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/fsl,qoriq-mc.yaml
> > F: Documentation/networking/device_drivers/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/overview.rst
> > F: drivers/bus/fsl-mc/
> > F: include/uapi/linux/fsl_mc.h
> >
> > +PW Locks
> > +M: Leonardo Bras <leobras.c@xxxxxxxxx>
> > +S: Supported
> > +F: Documentation/locking/pwlocks.rst
> > +F: include/linux/pwlocks.h
> > +F: kernel/pwlocks.c
>
> MAINTAINERS entries should be in alphabetical order: PW is not in the
> middle of the Q entries.
Hi Randy, thank you for reviewing!
Argh, sorry, it used to be called QPW. I renamed and forgot to reorder.
>
> > +
> > QT1010 MEDIA DRIVER
> > L: linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > S: Orphan
> > W: https://linuxtv.org
> > Q: http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/list/
> > F: drivers/media/tuners/qt1010*
> >
> > QUALCOMM ATH12K WIRELESS DRIVER
> > M: Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > L: linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> > diff --git a/Documentation/locking/pwlocks.rst b/Documentation/locking/pwlocks.rst
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..09f4a5417bc1
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/locking/pwlocks.rst
> > @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
> > +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +
> > +=========
> > +PW (Per-CPU Work) locks
> > +=========
>
> Overline and underline should be at least as long as the heading text.
>
Noted!
> > +
> > +Some places in the kernel implement a parallel programming strategy
> > +consisting on local_locks() for most of the work, and some rare remote
> > +operations are scheduled on target cpu. This keeps cache bouncing low since
>
> on a target CPU.
Right
>
> > +cacheline tends to be mostly local, and avoids the cost of locks in non-RT
> > +kernels, even though the very few remote operations will be expensive due
> > +to scheduling overhead.
> > +
> > +On the other hand, for RT workloads this can represent a problem:
> > +scheduling work on remote cpu that are executing low latency tasks
>
> CPUs
Will fix
>
> > +is undesired and can introduce unexpected deadline misses.
>
> undesirable
> ?
Yes
>
> > +
> > +PW locks help to convert sites that use local_locks (for cpu local operations)
> > +and queue_work_on (for queueing work remotely, to be executed
> > +locally on the owner cpu of the lock) to a spinlocks.
>
> to spinlocks.
>
Right
> > +
> > +The lock is declared pw_lock_t type.
> > +The lock is initialized with pw_lock_init.
> > +The lock is locked with pw_lock (takes a lock and cpu as a parameter).
> > +The lock is unlocked with pw_unlock (takes a lock and cpu as a parameter).
> > +
> > +The pw_lock_irqsave function disables interrupts and saves current interrupt state,
> > +cpu as a parameter.
> > +
> > +For trylock variant, there is the pw_trylock_t type, initialized with
> > +pw_trylock_init. Then the corresponding pw_trylock and pw_trylock_irqsave.
> > +
> > +work_struct should be replaced by pw_struct, which contains a cpu parameter
> > +(owner cpu of the lock), initialized by INIT_PW.
> > +
> > +The queue work related functions (analogous to queue_work_on and flush_work) are:
> > +pw_queue_on and pw_flush.
> > +
> > +The behaviour of the PW lock functions is as follows:
> > +
> > +* !CONFIG_PWLOCKS (or CONFIG_PWLOCKS and pwlocks=off kernel boot parameter):
> > + - pw_lock: local_lock
> > + - pw_lock_irqsave: local_lock_irqsave
> > + - pw_trylock: local_trylock
> > + - pw_trylock_irqsave: local_trylock_irqsave
> > + - pw_unlock: local_unlock
> > + - pw_lock_local: local_lock
> > + - pw_trylock_local: local_trylock
> > + - pw_unlock_local: local_unlock
> > + - pw_queue_on: queue_work_on
> > + - pw_flush: flush_work
> > +
> > +* CONFIG_PWLOCKS (and CONFIG_PWLOCKS_DEFAULT=y or pwlocks=on kernel boot parameter),
> > + - pw_lock: spin_lock
> > + - pw_lock_irqsave: spin_lock_irqsave
> > + - pw_trylock: spin_trylock
> > + - pw_trylock_irqsave: spin_trylock_irqsave
> > + - pw_unlock: spin_unlock
> > + - pw_lock_local: preempt_disable OR migrate_disable + spin_lock
> > + - pw_trylock_local: preempt_disable OR migrate_disable + spin_trylock
> > + - pw_unlock_local: preempt_enable OR migrate_enable + spin_unlock
> > + - pw_queue_on: executes work function on caller cpu
> > + - pw_flush: empty
> > +
> > +pw_get_cpu(work_struct), to be called from within per-cpu work function,
> > +returns the target cpu.
>
> CPU.
>
Will fix
> > +
> > +On the locking functions above, there are the local locking functions
> > +(pw_lock_local, pw_trylock_local and pw_unlock_local) that must only
> > +be used to access per-CPU data from the CPU that owns that data,
> > +and never remotely. They disable preemption/migration and don't require
> > +a cpu parameter, making them a replacement for local_lock functions that
> > +does not introduce overhead.
> > +
> > +These should only be used when accessing per-CPU data of the local CPU.
> > +
>
> Running "make htmldocs" with this patch says:
>
> Documentation/locking/pwlocks.rst: WARNING: document isn't included in any toctree [toc.not_included]
>
Humm, I will figure out a way of including it in a relevant toctree.
> > diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> > index 2937c4d308ae..3fb751dc4530 100644
> > --- a/init/Kconfig
> > +++ b/init/Kconfig
> > @@ -764,20 +764,55 @@ config CPU_ISOLATION
> > depends on SMP
> > default y
> > help
> > Make sure that CPUs running critical tasks are not disturbed by
> > any source of "noise" such as unbound workqueues, timers, kthreads...
> > Unbound jobs get offloaded to housekeeping CPUs. This is driven by
> > the "isolcpus=" boot parameter.
> >
> > Say Y if unsure.
> >
> > +config PWLOCKS
> > + bool "Per-CPU Work locks"
> > + depends on SMP || COMPILE_TEST
> > + default n
> > + help
> > + Allow changing the behavior on per-CPU resource sharing with cache,
> > + from the regular local_locks() + queue_work_on(remote_cpu) to using
> > + per-CPU spinlocks on both local and remote operations.
> > +
> > + This is useful to give user the option on reducing IPIs to CPUs, and
>
> to give the user
Right
>
> > + thus reduce interruptions and context switches. On the other hand, it
> > + increases generated code and will use atomic operations if spinlocks
> > + are selected.
> > +
> > + If set, will use the default behavior set in PWLOCKS_DEFAULT unless boot
>
> unless the boot
>
Correct
> > + parameter pwlocks is passed with a different behavior.
> > +
> > + If unset, will use the local_lock() + queue_work_on() strategy,
> > + regardless of the boot parameter or PWLOCKS_DEFAULT.
> > +
> > + Say N if unsure.
> > +
> > +config PWLOCKS_DEFAULT
> > + bool "Use per-CPU spinlocks by default on PWLOCKS"
> > + depends on PWLOCKS
> > + default n
> > + help
> > + If set, will use per-CPU spinlocks as default behavior for per-CPU
> > + remote operations.
> > +
> > + If unset, will use local_lock() + queue_work_on(cpu) as default
> > + behavior for remote operations.
> > +
> > + Say N if unsure
>
> unsure.
>
Yeap :)
> > +
> > source "kernel/rcu/Kconfig"
> >
> > config IKCONFIG
> > tristate "Kernel .config support"
> > help
> > This option enables the complete Linux kernel ".config" file
> > contents to be saved in the kernel. It provides documentation
> > of which kernel options are used in a running kernel or in an
> > on-disk kernel. This information can be extracted from the kernel
> > image file with the script scripts/extract-ikconfig and used as
>
> --
> ~Randy
>
Thanks!
Leo