Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: display: sn65dsi83: Add output data-lanes

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski

Date: Wed Jul 15 2026 - 02:08:44 EST


On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 10:26:19AM +0200, Wojciech Dubowik wrote:
> From: Wojciech Dubowik <Wojciech.Dubowik@xxxxxx>
>
> Add an optional output lvds data lanes property with
> two allowed values. The array <1 2 3 4> for standard
> layout and <4 3 2 1> for reversed lvds output lanes.
> The latter informs the driver that reverse lvds config
> option has to be set in config register for the respective
> output channel.

Please wrap commit message according to Linux coding style / submission
process (neither too early nor over the limit):
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.4-rc1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L597

>
> Signed-off-by: Wojciech Dubowik <Wojciech.Dubowik@xxxxxx>
> ---
> .../bindings/display/bridge/ti,sn65dsi83.yaml | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,sn65dsi83.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,sn65dsi83.yaml
> index e69b6343a8eb..2693c0273f9a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,sn65dsi83.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,sn65dsi83.yaml
> @@ -86,10 +86,62 @@ properties:
> description: Video port for LVDS Channel-A output (panel or bridge).
> $ref: '#/$defs/lvds-port'
>
> + properties:
> + endpoint:
> + $ref: /schemas/media/video-interfaces.yaml#
> + unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> + properties:
> + data-lanes:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array
> + description: |

Drop |

> + Array of physical LVDS data lane indexes
> + oneOf:
> + - items:
> + - const: 1
> + - const: 2
> + - const: 3
> + - const: 4
> + description: |

As well

> + This is the default layout
> + - items:
> + - const: 4
> + - const: 3
> + - const: 2
> + - const: 1
> + description: |

Ditto

> + This is the reversed layout

Honestly, this previous description are redundant. I can read 4-3-2-1
and I do understand it is a reversed from 1-2-3-4.

Do not explain the obvious code, but rather design behind. Just drop the
descriptions except the first one.

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Best regards,
Krzysztof