Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v2 1/2] tcp: Add net.ipv4.tcp_purge_receive_queue sysctl
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Wed Jul 15 2026 - 11:57:55 EST
On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 4:54 PM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Introduce a new sysctl knob, net.ipv4.tcp_purge_receive_queue, to
> address an unreleased SKBs issue related to TCP sockets.
>
> Issue:
> When a TCP socket in the CLOSE_WAIT state receives a RST packet, the
> current implementation does not clear the socket's receive queue. This
> causes SKBs in the queue to remain allocated until the socket is
> explicitly closed by the application. As a consequence:
>
> 1. The page pool pages held by these SKBs are not released.
> 2. The associated page pool cannot be freed.
>
> RFC 9293 Section 3.10.7.4 specifies that when a RST is received in
> CLOSE_WAIT state, "all segment queues should be flushed." However, the
> current implementation does not flush the receive queue.
>
> Solution:
> Add a per-namespace sysctl (net.ipv4.tcp_purge_receive_queue) that,
> when enabled, causes the kernel to purge the receive queue when a RST
> packet is received in CLOSE_WAIT state. This allows immediate release
> of SKBs and their associated memory resources.
>
> The feature is disabled by default to maintain backward compatibility
> with existing behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst | 18 +++++++++++++++
> .../net_cachelines/netns_ipv4_sysctl.rst | 1 +
> include/net/netns/ipv4.h | 1 +
> net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c | 9 ++++++++
> net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 51 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst b/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst
> index 208f46967ee5..abbee0326f15 100644
> --- a/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst
> @@ -1448,6 +1448,24 @@ tcp_rto_max_ms - INTEGER
>
> Default: 120,000
>
> +tcp_purge_receive_queue - BOOLEAN
> + When a socket in the TCP_CLOSE_WAIT state receives a RST packet, the
> + default behavior is to not clear its receive queue. As a result,
> + any SKBs in the queue are not freed until the socket is closed.
> + Consequently, the pages held by these SKBs are not released, which
> + can also prevent the associated page pool from being freed.
> +
> + If enabled, the receive queue is purged upon receiving the RST,
> + allowing the SKBs and their associated memory to be released
> + promptly.
> +
> + Possible values:
> +
> + - 0 (disabled)
> + - 1 (enabled)
> +
> + Default: 0 (disabled)
> +
> UDP variables
> =============
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/networking/net_cachelines/netns_ipv4_sysctl.rst b/Documentation/networking/net_cachelines/netns_ipv4_sysctl.rst
> index 3dc03bff739e..2945de40ad78 100644
> --- a/Documentation/networking/net_cachelines/netns_ipv4_sysctl.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/networking/net_cachelines/netns_ipv4_sysctl.rst
> @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ unsigned_long sysctl_tcp_comp_sack_delay_ns
> unsigned_long sysctl_tcp_comp_sack_slack_ns __tcp_ack_snd_check
> int sysctl_max_syn_backlog
> int sysctl_tcp_fastopen
> +u8 sysctl_tcp_purge_receive_queue
> struct_tcp_congestion_ops tcp_congestion_control init_cc
> struct_tcp_fastopen_context tcp_fastopen_ctx
> unsigned_int sysctl_tcp_fastopen_blackhole_timeout
> diff --git a/include/net/netns/ipv4.h b/include/net/netns/ipv4.h
> index cb7f8bf15671..ab9b92807d9f 100644
> --- a/include/net/netns/ipv4.h
> +++ b/include/net/netns/ipv4.h
> @@ -222,6 +222,7 @@ struct netns_ipv4 {
> u8 sysctl_tcp_nometrics_save;
> u8 sysctl_tcp_no_ssthresh_metrics_save;
> u8 sysctl_tcp_workaround_signed_windows;
> + u8 sysctl_tcp_purge_receive_queue;
> int sysctl_tcp_challenge_ack_limit;
> u8 sysctl_tcp_min_tso_segs;
> u8 sysctl_tcp_reflect_tos;
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c
> index ca1180dba1de..82412fd98e0e 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c
> @@ -1652,6 +1652,15 @@ static struct ctl_table ipv4_net_table[] = {
> .extra1 = SYSCTL_ONE_THOUSAND,
> .extra2 = &tcp_rto_max_max,
> },
> + {
> + .procname = "tcp_purge_receive_queue",
> + .data = &init_net.ipv4.sysctl_tcp_purge_receive_queue,
> + .maxlen = sizeof(u8),
> + .mode = 0644,
> + .proc_handler = proc_dou8vec_minmax,
> + .extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO,
> + .extra2 = SYSCTL_ONE,
> + },
> };
>
> static __net_init int ipv4_sysctl_init_net(struct net *net)
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> index 61045a8886e4..4f1027173e95 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> @@ -4853,6 +4853,7 @@ void tcp_done_with_error(struct sock *sk, int err)
> /* When we get a reset we do this. */
> void tcp_reset(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> + const struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
> int err;
>
> trace_tcp_receive_reset(sk);
> @@ -4869,6 +4870,27 @@ void tcp_reset(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> err = ECONNREFUSED;
> break;
> case TCP_CLOSE_WAIT:
> + /* RFC9293 3.10.7.4. Other States
> + * Second, check the RST bit:
> + * CLOSE-WAIT STATE
> + *
> + * If the RST bit is set, then any outstanding RECEIVEs and
> + * SEND should receive "reset" responses. All segment queues
> + * should be flushed. Users should also receive an unsolicited
> + * general "connection reset" signal. Enter the CLOSED state,
> + * delete the TCB, and return.
> + *
> + * If net.ipv4.tcp_purge_receive_queue is enabled,
> + * sk_receive_queue will be flushed too.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_purge_receive_queue))) {
> + struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
> +
> + skb_queue_purge(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
> + WRITE_ONCE(tp->copied_seq, tp->rcv_nxt);
> + WRITE_ONCE(tp->urg_data, 0);
> + sk_set_peek_off(sk, -1);
> + }
> err = EPIPE;
> break;
> case TCP_CLOSE:
> --
> 2.55.0
>
My thoughts are:
out_of_order_queue has been forgotten. skbs could be there and still
'block devmem'
WRITE_ONCE(tp->copied_seq, tp->rcv_nxt) is certainly wrong, because
read() will return 0, instead of -1 (errno = EPIPE or ECONNRESET)
So the application will not know a RST was received :/
I think that BSD and linux implementations have historically retained
acknowledged,
buffered receive data upon RST to allow applications to drain data
already ACKed prior to the reset.
Adding a narrow sysctl specifically for CLOSE_WAIT creates
inconsistent behavior across TCP states.
Thanks.