Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] mm/hmm: Clarify notifier retry state and scope HMM timeouts

[Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)]

On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 12:02:10PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 07:42:48AM -0700, Stanislav Kinsburskii wrote:
>
> > > > Stanislav Kinsburskii (4):
> > > >       fixup! mm/hmm: add hmm_range_fault_unlocked_timeout() for mmap lock-drop support
> > > >       fixup! drm/nouveau: use hmm_range_fault_unlocked_timeout() for SVM faults
> > > >       fixup! accel/amdxdna: use hmm_range_fault_unlocked_timeout() for range population
> > > >       fixup! drm/gpusvm: use hmm_range_fault_unlocked_timeout() for range faults
> > >
> > > Why a fixup series instead of properly resending the full thing?
> > >
> >
> > The goal was to get a Sashiko review, and v8 has already been applied to
> > both `mm-new` and `linux-next`.
>
> I think if you send the whole thing with a base-commit tag that
> specifies a real base commit in linux-next sashiko should work
>
> Jason

Oh so just use b4 then :)