Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] mm/hmm: Clarify notifier retry state and scope HMM timeouts

[Andrew Morton]

On Wed, 15 Jul 2026 09:39:37 -0700 Stanislav Kinsburskii <skinsburskii@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > > The goal was to get a Sashiko review, and v8 has already been applied to
> > > both `mm-new` and `linux-next`.
> > 
> > Please don't do this, this is completely impossible to track for review :)
> > 
> > mm review is currently very difficult based on volumes, it'll become impossible
> > to manage if people sound fragments of series.
> > 
> > Please just resend the whole thing at this point.
> > 
> 
> Well, I followed the guidance provided by Andrew, and I believe he
> applied all of the changes, including these, to the `mm` tree.
> 
> Do you still want me to send v9 under these circumstances?

Sure, if that's what reviewers prefer.

This is a bit unfriendly to people who have already reviewed the code. 
Which is one of the reasons why I respond to a new version with a
single diff showing reviewers (and the author, and myself) what changed
since the previous version.