Re: [PATCH 6.18 000/675] 6.18.42-rc1 review

[Sasha Levin]

On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 08:17:17PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> Having said that, there is something going on a bit confusing: commits
> "part one" (4a9671a03f2b) and "part two" (ba110db8e1bc) in mainline seem
> to have been merged into just the "part two" above in this -rc. Is that
> intentional? I am asking because the original removal of the `lib`
> folder happened in "part one" in mainline, so I was expecting to have to
> point to that one above, but it doesn't exist on its own.

No, that was not intentional - part one got squashed into the part two
backport by mistake on my end, which is also why the `lib` removal has
no commit of its own to point at.

I can revert and re-do if there's interest in that?

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha