Re: [PATCH 6.18 000/675] 6.18.42-rc1 review

[Miguel Ojeda]

On Sun, Aug 2, 2026 at 12:13 AM Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> No, that was not intentional - part one got squashed into the part two
> backport by mistake on my end, which is also why the `lib` removal has
> no commit of its own to point at.
>
> I can revert and re-do if there's interest in that?

I guess it depends if there is some advantage/clarity by doing so for
the future for you, or maintainers, or people using the stable patches
etc. -- for me it is fine either way :)

i.e. I mostly mentioned it because it seemed odd and other issues
could be hiding, e.g. maybe a backporting script somewhere had a bug.

Cheers,
Miguel