Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: display: rockchip,lvds: add RK3568
From: Rob Herring
Date: Fri Aug 07 2026 - 18:31:39 EST
On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 10:08:22AM +0200, Rok Markovic wrote:
> The RK3568 LVDS transmitter has no register block of its own: it is
> programmed entirely through the GRF and re-uses the MIPI DSI0 D-PHY
> (rockchip,rk3568-dsi-dphy) in LVDS mode. It therefore takes the same
> shape as px30: phys/phy-names, no reg, and no clock of its own.
>
> Since the block exposes no MMIO, nothing in the LVDS path is clocked
> from the DSI controller's APB clock; that gate is held off while LVDS
> scans out. It has no analog supplies of its own and no pinctrl either:
> the lanes are dedicated D-PHY pins, not muxable GPIOs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rok Markovic <rok@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - RK3568 now takes no clock (clocks/clock-names disabled, as for
> px30): the block has no register space, so nothing consumes the
> DSI controller's APB clock.
>
> .../display/rockchip/rockchip,lvds.yaml | 22 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip,lvds.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip,lvds.yaml
> index 03b002a..b77d4fa 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip,lvds.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip,lvds.yaml
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ properties:
> enum:
> - rockchip,px30-lvds
> - rockchip,rk3288-lvds
> + - rockchip,rk3568-lvds
>
> reg:
> maxItems: 1
> @@ -121,6 +122,27 @@ allOf:
> - avdd1v8-supply
> - avdd3v3-supply
>
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + contains:
> + const: rockchip,rk3568-lvds
> +
> + then:
> + properties:
> + reg: false
> + clocks: false
> + clock-names: false
> + avdd1v0-supply: false
> + avdd1v8-supply: false
> + avdd3v3-supply: false
> + pinctrl-names: false
> + pinctrl-0: false
Other than pinctrl props, this is the same as the existing px30 if/then
schema, so just add the compatible there. pinctrl properties are
implicitly always allowed.
Really, I think this and px30 and this should be its own schema. There's
not a lot of common parts.
Finally, if the only interface is the GRF, then this should be a child
of the GRF node.
Rob