Re: [PATCH] docs: add AGENTS.md as a symlink to README
From: Sasha Levin
Date: Thu Sep 24 2026 - 11:23:13 EST
On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 04:08:08PM +0100, Bradley Morgan wrote:
On 24 September 2026 14:49:45 BST, Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Most coding agents have standardized on AGENTS.md as the file they load
automatically from the root of a repository. README already tells AI
tools to read and follow Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst,
but that only helps if the agent decides to read README before acting,
which in practice it often doesn't.
Add a top-level AGENTS.md symlink to README, so agents load it on their
own and follow its pointer to the AI guidelines. This keeps a single
entry point for every reader, and avoids adding a separate copy of the
policy that could drift from the RST.
As an example, two different agents were asked to "create a new commit
renaming the release (in the Makefile) to AI Test".
Without AGENTS.md, the first agent added a Signed-off-by for the user on
its own. It should never have done that: only the human submitter can
certify the Developer Certificate of Origin, after reviewing the change.
It also used its own attribution tag instead of Assisted-by:
Makefile: rename release to AI Test
Co-Authored-By: <model name> <noreply@...>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
The second agent added no attribution at all:
Rename release to AI Test
With AGENTS.md in place, neither agent added a Signed-off-by, and both
used the Assisted-by tag. README itself mentions neither tag, so both
agents followed its pointer to coding-assistants.rst:
Makefile: rename release to "AI Test"
Change the release name from "Baby Opossum Posse" to "AI Test".
Assisted-by: LLM
Makefile: rename release to AI Test
Assisted-by: LLM
Both agents also followed the kernel's general guidelines more closely.
The second agent's subject gained the "subsystem: summary phrase" form
that submitting-patches.rst asks for, instead of a bare "Rename release
to AI Test", and the first agent added a body describing the change.
Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
NAK, we could add to memories that to read soandso file before every
patch, and then it wouldn't increase tokens then?
Could you help me understand what you meant here? I'm aware some agents use a
notion of "memories", but I don't think they standardized on it in any way, nor
how we could incorporate them here?
And as far as I'm aware, nothing is free here - those "memories" still use
tokens.
--
Thanks,
Sasha