Re: Path forward for Virtualized Swap?

[Nhat Pham]

On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 9:59 AM Kairui Song <ryncsn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2026 at 8:19 PM David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On 9/22/26 15:38, Chris Li wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 8:56 AM Nhat Pham <nphamcs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 11:50 PM Chris Li <chrisl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>> No that time slot is too late for Asia developers. I don't think we
> > >>> should use that time slot for swap alignment.
> > >>>
> > >>> We should find a time slot more friendly to Asia.
> > >>
> > >> Any time slot would have that kind of problem. We're spread out across
> > >> the globe.
> > >>
> > >> Let's just use a standardized time slot we have for MM alignment sessions.
> > >
> > > There are more swap maintainers in Asia than in the US + Europe, at
> > > least based on the maintainer file. Please be more inclusive. If the
> > > alignment is done without key stakeholders, it miss the point.
> > >
> > > Sigh, we can't even align on a time slot.
> > >
> > > In that case, let's keep discussing on the mailing list. At least it
> > > is accessible to every one.
> >
> > Looking at the mailing list, that approach doesn't seem to work.
> >
> > Finding a time slot that makes US, Europe and Asia happy is ... tricky.
> >
> > 1 AM is certainly unpleasant.
> >
> > US vs. Asia is also tricky, but doable.
> >
> > China 8AM vs. US West Coast 5PM?
> >
> > China 9AM vs. US West Coast 6PM?
>
> Hi David,
>
> Thanks so much for suggesting this. Sorry for the late response; last
> week's travel resulted in a lot of piled-up work for me.
>
> Both slots look fine to me.

Hmm let's push it a week. Johannes might be out for some personal
stuff - I'll let him respond with a preferred time.