Re: Path forward for Virtualized Swap?

[Baoquan He]

On 10/05/26 at 01:06pm, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> On 9/22/26 15:38, Chris Li wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 8:56 AM Nhat Pham <nphamcs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 11:50 PM Chris Li <chrisl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> No that time slot is too late for Asia developers. I don't think we
> >>> should use that time slot for swap alignment.
> >>>
> >>> We should find a time slot more friendly to Asia.
> >>
> >> Any time slot would have that kind of problem. We're spread out across
> >> the globe.
> >>
> >> Let's just use a standardized time slot we have for MM alignment sessions.
> > 
> > There are more swap maintainers in Asia than in the US + Europe, at
> > least based on the maintainer file. Please be more inclusive. If the
> > alignment is done without key stakeholders, it miss the point.
> > 
> > Sigh, we can't even align on a time slot.
> > 
> > In that case, let's keep discussing on the mailing list. At least it
> > is accessible to every one.
> 
> Looking at the mailing list, that approach doesn't seem to work.
> 
> Finding a time slot that makes US, Europe and Asia happy is ... tricky.
> 
> 1 AM is certainly unpleasant.
> 
> US vs. Asia is also tricky, but doable.
> 
> China 8AM vs. US West Coast 5PM?
> 
> China 9AM vs. US West Coast 6PM?
> 
> (Europe is 2AM vs. 3AM, who besides me from Europe would join?)

Hi David,

Thanks for the suggestion and for organizing this meeting. Both time
slot is fine to me.

I also support collecting the concerns or issues people care about in
advance and discussing them during the meeting.

Thanks
Baoquan