Re: [PATCH] fuse: rename fuse_direct_io() to fuse_sync_direct_io()

[Miklos Szeredi]

On Fri, 4 Sept 2026 at 15:17, Luis Henriques <luis@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> FUSE has two functions with very similar name: fuse_direct_io() and
> fuse_direct_IO().  Which is very confusing.  Rename one of them to remove
> the ambiguity.

Intention is good, but fuse_sync_direct_io() is not the best name,
because it's used for both sync and async direct IO.

How about fuse_do_direct_io()?

Thanks,
Miklos