Re: [PATCH] fuse: rename fuse_direct_io() to fuse_sync_direct_io()

[Luis Henriques]

On Thu, Oct 15 2026, Miklos Szeredi wrote:

> On Fri, 4 Sept 2026 at 15:17, Luis Henriques <luis@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> FUSE has two functions with very similar name: fuse_direct_io() and
>> fuse_direct_IO().  Which is very confusing.  Rename one of them to remove
>> the ambiguity.
>
> Intention is good, but fuse_sync_direct_io() is not the best name,
> because it's used for both sync and async direct IO.
>
> How about fuse_do_direct_io()?

OK, thanks for the suggestion.  I'll respin this patch with that name
instead.

Cheers,
-- 
Luís