Re: Missing signoff in the clk tree

[Brian Masney]

Hey Mark,

On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 2:15 PM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 11:08:35AM -0400, Brian Masney wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 10:03 AM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > And today.  I see the commits were actually done by Brian (CCed), who
> > > also appears to be a new maintainer for the clock tree - I guess the
> > > contacts for the tree need updating to include him?
>
> > I will fix that this evening. Sorry about that.
>
> > Jerome and I were added as the new co-maintainers and we are listed in
> > the MAINTAINERS file. Is there somewhere else that we should be added
> > for linux-clk?
>
> Yes, you need to tell me about it - there's a separate list of contacts
> for the various trees in -next since there isn't a 1:1 correspondance
> between them.

I fixed the clk-next tree (via clk-pile). Sorry about that and I
definitely see now why not to rebase the tree, especially with two
co-maintainers!

Let me know if there's anything else you need to do regarding the
contacts for next, or if this is enough. Also just a heads up that
Mike stepped down so you can remove him. It's now me, Jerome and
Stephen.

Brian