Re: Missing signoff in the clk tree

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 07:57:40PM -0400, Brian Masney wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 2:15 PM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Yes, you need to tell me about it - there's a separate list of contacts
> > for the various trees in -next since there isn't a 1:1 correspondance
> > between them.

> I fixed the clk-next tree (via clk-pile). Sorry about that and I
> definitely see now why not to rebase the tree, especially with two
> co-maintainers!

> Let me know if there's anything else you need to do regarding the
> contacts for next, or if this is enough. Also just a heads up that
> Mike stepped down so you can remove him. It's now me, Jerome and
> Stephen.

Thanks, I've updated the contacts for the clk branches.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature