Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > >For embedded systems I can see it is an issue, /proc is simply too large
> > >to include just for a few constants.
> >
> > Just how large IS proc, anyway, and is this even noticable in the
> > steadily increasing size of the kernel?
>
> Including the dentry tree for a small configuration and all the device proc
> code about 70-80K last time I measured it
And how big would a text-id'ed sysctl() be in relation to this?
(Is the 70-80k the core size or the size in the image?)
____
david parsons \bi/ Inquiring minds, etc.
\/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 15 2000 - 21:00:15 EST