Re: stuff about proc (was: [something. blame elm])

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Sun Jan 09 2000 - 19:24:20 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: es1370 not functioning anymore in 2.2.14?"
Previous message: Mitchell Blank Jr: "Re: [patch] 2.3.39pre2: typo in atm/nicstar.c"
In reply to: david parsons: "stuff about proc (was: [something. blame elm])"
Next in thread: david parsons: "Re: stuff about proc (was: [something. blame elm])"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> And how big would a text-id'ed sysctl() be in relation to this?
> (Is the 70-80k the core size or the size in the image?)

70-80K includes dentries/inodes etc

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: es1370 not functioning anymore in 2.2.14?"
Previous message: Mitchell Blank Jr: "Re: [patch] 2.3.39pre2: typo in atm/nicstar.c"
In reply to: david parsons: "stuff about proc (was: [something. blame elm])"
Next in thread: david parsons: "Re: stuff about proc (was: [something. blame elm])"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 15 2000 - 21:00:17 EST