Re: bootimg and LOBOS

From: Ronald G. Minnich (rminnich@lanl.gov)
Date: Wed Mar 01 2000 - 16:19:19 EST


On Wed, 1 Mar 2000 almesber@lrc.di.epfl.ch wrote:

> > and Intel support has already told me that (1), it's secret, and
> > (2), they don't want to tell me the secret).
> Hmm, is this some kind of recovery part ? Then it would make sense to
> keep this confidential lest some friendly people start spreading
> trojans that kill not only your flash but also your only chance to get
> it back ...

it's not the recovery part, it's regular flash. Flash is written by
pumping the processor into SMM mode and running code out of the SMM memory
in BigReal mode. As part of the process it sets the Secret Bit. Of course,
the bad guys already know which bit that is :-) (but we don't :-()

They don't seem to worry as much about being sued by Intel, wonder why :-)

The recovery part is protected by a physical jumper, thank goodness.

As for bootimg I think it does enough that I can get LOBOS functionality
out of it, so it's no big deal. But we still have to think about PTEs on
other boxes.

ron

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 07 2000 - 21:00:10 EST