Re: [patch] Space.c and -fwritable-strings

From: Andrew Morton (andrewm@uow.edu.au)
Date: Wed Apr 05 2000 - 03:14:40 EST

Next message: Graham Stoney: "Re: [PATCH] fixes for kernel with no procfs."
Previous message: Manfred Spraul: "Re: **** LVM 0.8final patch vs. 2.3.99-pre3 ***"
In reply to: Tim Waugh: "Re: [patch] Space.c and -fwritable-strings"
Next in thread: Tim Waugh: "Re: [patch] Space.c and -fwritable-strings"
Reply: Tim Waugh: "Re: [patch] Space.c and -fwritable-strings"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Tim Waugh wrote:
>
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2000, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > Was the way to go. Was there a problem with this approach?
>
> No. Do you want to make a patch, or shall I?

Who, me? I just boss other people about :-)

I've sent you a patch direct, plus a little script which compiles
Space.c with everything enabled. Please cast an eye across it.

I changed the padding on the "tr%d" strings from __PAD3 to __PAD4 also.

-- -akpm-

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Graham Stoney: "Re: [PATCH] fixes for kernel with no procfs."
Previous message: Manfred Spraul: "Re: **** LVM 0.8final patch vs. 2.3.99-pre3 ***"
In reply to: Tim Waugh: "Re: [patch] Space.c and -fwritable-strings"
Next in thread: Tim Waugh: "Re: [patch] Space.c and -fwritable-strings"
Reply: Tim Waugh: "Re: [patch] Space.c and -fwritable-strings"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 07 2000 - 21:00:14 EST