"Jones D (ISaCS)" writes:
> So should I continue to add the ifdefs for those that don't ?
> I've a 15kb patch already waiting that does this for a majority
> of the codebase.
Well I'm keen; I haven't succeeded in getting -ffunction-sections working yet
to do it automagically. Some of the /proc support functions are `static' and
need the #ifdef anyway just to stop gcc warning about them, so I doubt we will
nuke all the #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS's altogether.
I'm also looking at nuking all the kernel message stuff to save even more
space on deeply embedded systems. Get rid of all those human-readable strings
and syslog functions to save another 100k or so. I almost managed to exclude
sprintf, but it's used pretty heavily by the networking stuff for other
reasons.
Regards,
Graham
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 07 2000 - 21:00:14 EST